[Wireshark-dev] New anonymous SVN server

2009-02-20 Thread Gerald Combs
I'm in the process of migrating Wireshark's anonymous SVN repository to a new server. During the testing phase you can access the new server by substituting "anonsvntest" for "anonsvn" in the repository URLs, e.g. http://anonsvntest.wireshark.org/wireshark/. If you want to try syncing against the n

[Wireshark-dev] Fw: SMB Parsers

2009-02-20 Thread big dev
Any ideas Folks Dev On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:41 AM, big dev wrote: > Hi Folks > > I am trying to understand the notion of parsing a SMB packet under > wireshark, espcially the flags2 field in the smb header. This is a 16bit > value where we have 14 flags with 2 reserved bits but wireshark int

[Wireshark-dev] 3GPP LTE NAS ESM protocols: (3GPP TS 24.301)

2009-02-20 Thread Buddie
3GPP NAS protocols: EPS NAS (3GPP TS 24.301) I am particularly interested in ESM protocol. Are the dissectors for these protocols are available in the release of Wireshark ? Which file I should look for? I found EMM (EPS Mobility Management) support "packet-nas_eps.c" in this file but couldnt f

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-ppc

2009-02-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-ppc on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-ppc/builds/536 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reason: Buil

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27489: /trunk/ /trunk/gtk/: Makefile.nmake rtp_analysis.c /trunk/tools/: make-tap-reg.py

2009-02-20 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:13 AM, etx...@wireshark.org wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=27489 > > User: etxrab > Date: 2009/02/20 09:13 AM > > Log: > Replace the clists with gtk_list_store > Should fix bug https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi? > id

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RADIUS 2 byte dictionary support

2009-02-20 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:52:43PM +0100, Robert Saye wrote: > My company recently started shipping 2 byte custom dictionaries with > our products. I noticed in the base RADIUS dictionary file that > Wireshark doesn't support this yet '# we do not support 16bit > attribute codes yet'. Is anyone

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2009-02-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/1755 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Bui

[Wireshark-dev] RADIUS 2 byte dictionary support

2009-02-20 Thread Robert Saye
Hi all, My company recently started shipping 2 byte custom dictionaries with our products. I noticed in the base RADIUS dictionary file that Wireshark doesn't support this yet '# we do not support 16bit attribute codes yet'. Is anyone working on this, I don't want to duplicate any effort, but o