[Wireshark-dev] aclocal-fallback/glib.m4 and gtk.m4 removed from trunk

2008-10-21 Thread Stephen Fisher
For Unix developers: I just removed aclocal-fallback/glib.m4 and gtk.m4 from the trunk, since the development version of Wireshark (1.1.x) only works with GTK and GLIB v2. These removed files were leftovers from when we supported GTK/GLIB v1. They will remain, however, in the stable tree (1.0

Re: [Wireshark-dev] The native MacOS X GTK port is in beta now

2008-10-21 Thread Ian Schorr
Very cool, I'll have to try it when I get home. Next big step would to make it a self-contained binarily-distributable appbundle =) On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > The native MacOS X GTK port is now in beta and a easy to install > framework is availabl

[Wireshark-dev] The native MacOS X GTK port is in beta now

2008-10-21 Thread Stephen Fisher
The native MacOS X GTK port is now in beta and a easy to install framework is available from http://www.gtk-osx.org. I've found an easy way to compile Wireshark with it to make it a native OS X application with only a few limitations found so far (the Wireshark logo isn't showing up and menus

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Installing a new dissector

2008-10-21 Thread Maynard, Chris
See attached. Note that I made very quick changes just to get it to compile. I leave it to you to clean up the dissectors as you see fit ... > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireshark-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Breno Jacinto > Sent: Tuesday, October 21,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Installing a new dissector

2008-10-21 Thread Breno Jacinto
OK, thank you... this is very weird. You said you applied some changes in the dissectors in order to compile without the warnings. Could you send them so that I can test them here? This way I'll be sure if it's a Linux issue or a dissector issue. best regards, -- -- :: Breno Jacinto :: :: breno

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Installing a new dissector

2008-10-21 Thread Maynard, Chris
Yes, all 3 show up in the protocols list. But I'm currently having some unrelated trouble with the latest SVN, so I was only able to test it against Wireshark 1.0.3. And keep in mind that I'm working on Windows XP, not Linux. - Chris > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WG: Wireshark 1.0.3

2008-10-21 Thread Gerald Combs
Peter Harris wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Eder, Norbert wrote: >> Can you give me some config Values, that there are not so much traffic (for >> X11 forwarding) ?? >> Shell I compile it with some special options? >> Use some other packages?? > > What does xdpyinfo say? Make sure the R

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Installing a new dissector

2008-10-21 Thread Breno Jacinto
Hello Christopher, Did you check if the dissector shows up after you install it? Because if it's ok for you, then I should try on another system/configuration. best regards, -- :: Breno Jacinto :: :: breno - at - gprt.ufpe.br :: :: FingerPrint :: 2F15 8A61 F566 E442 8581 E3C0 EFF4 E20

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Creating an installer package which should install only my plugin

2008-10-21 Thread Gerald Combs
Wasiq md wrote: > Hello All, > > I am done creating a new dissector. I wanted to know how can I create a > installer package in windows which will install and uninstall only my > plugin. On Windows, Wireshark looks for plugins in two places: its installation directory ("$INSTDIR\plugins\$VERSION

[Wireshark-dev] Creating an installer package which should install only my plugin

2008-10-21 Thread Wasiq md
Hello All, I am done creating a new dissector. I wanted to know how can I create a installer package in windows which will install and uninstall only my plugin. Thanks, Wasiq ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org https://wireshark.o

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WG: Wireshark 1.0.3

2008-10-21 Thread Peter Harris
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Eder, Norbert wrote: > > Can you give me some config Values, that there are not so much traffic (for > X11 forwarding) ?? > Shell I compile it with some special options? > Use some other packages?? What does xdpyinfo say? Make sure the RENDER extension is enabled.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Query on HTTP

2008-10-21 Thread Abhik Sarkar
Perhaps netcat (http://m.nu/program/util/netcat/netcat.html) is of some help. On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:43 PM, prashanth joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I need to test HTTP for such commands as PUT, GET, DELETE, POST,LOGIN, > CONNECT. > How do I do this? I did a little search and though

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WG: Wireshark 1.0.3

2008-10-21 Thread Eder, Norbert
Hello all, Thx to Jaap and all others. I have compiled wireshark now with GTK1 and GLIB1 and it works fine with very less network traffic. If anybody will have this Solaris sparc package, please send me a mail. I can also provide the package for some web-pages THANKS!! Bye, Nobsi sf44

[Wireshark-dev] Query on HTTP

2008-10-21 Thread prashanth joshi
Hi, I need to test HTTP for such commands as PUT, GET, DELETE, POST,LOGIN, CONNECT. How do I do this? I did a little search and thought telnet could be used to test http. However I could not find any suitable information on testing HTTP. I am afraid this is not the right forum for a question on H

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WG: Wireshark 1.0.3

2008-10-21 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, I guess that the GTK1 version is less 'X intensive' than GTK2. So Wireshark 1.0.3 (GTK+ 2.12.0) is more intensive than Wireshark 0.99.3a (GTK+ 1.2.10). Have a go with the GTK1 build of Wireshark 1.0.3 and see what happens then. Thanx, Jaap Eder, Norbert wrote: > Hello, > > GTK1, but the e

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WG: Wireshark 1.0.3

2008-10-21 Thread Eder, Norbert
Hello, GTK1, but the exact thing: sf880-1@/root:> wireshark -v wireshark 0.99.3a Copyright 1998-2006 Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and contributors. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PU