On 08.03.2008, at 04:53, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Andreas Fink wrote:
>
>> I got some issues with the INAP dissector.
>>
>> Attached a crashlog, the stdout of wireshark and a tracefile.
>>
>> I did set INAP TCAP SSN to 146 to have it decoded in the preferences.
>>
>> Not
On Mar 5, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Andreas Fink wrote:
> I got some issues with the INAP dissector.
>
> Attached a crashlog, the stdout of wireshark and a tracefile.
>
> I did set INAP TCAP SSN to 146 to have it decoded in the preferences.
>
> Note there are two INAP packets. InitialDP and Connect.
> W
On Mar 7, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> A test dmg can be downloaded from
> http://www.wireshark.org/~gerald/Wireshark%200.99.9%20Intel.dmg. It
> has two
> components: a run-anywhere version of Wireshark and a set of
> wrappers for each
> command-line utility.
BTW, should I point p
I had a look at the packaging environment that Inkscape uses for OS X, and it
turned out to be easy to adapt for Wireshark. I've attached the patch to bug
2341 if anyone wants to play with it.
A test dmg can be downloaded from
http://www.wireshark.org/~gerald/Wireshark%200.99.9%20Intel.dmg. It has
Thank you the procedural info, Chris.
Cheers!
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Maynard, Chris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You've got the correct forum, but you may wish to file a bug report,
> with "Severity" marked as "Enhancement", so it doesn't get lost or
> forgotten:
> http://bugs.wiresh
You've got the correct forum, but you may wish to file a bug report,
with "Severity" marked as "Enhancement", so it doesn't get lost or
forgotten:
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Wireshark.
If the feature request is doable and someone has the time to do it, it
may make its
Is this the correct forum for Wireshark feature requests?
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Nicholas Kovats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great product!
>
> I have the latest 0.99.8.
>
> I use the Wireshark RTP player on a regular basis. I would find it
> very useful if I could click on a particul
I assume you have verified that the parts that are multiply defined
according to the linker are not multiply defined in the source code.
Are you including a .c file somewhere (instead of a .h file)? That could
lead to multiply defined instances of data and/or functions.
/ Peter
2008/3/6, A Verma
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/Windows-XP-x86/builds/4064
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: HEAD
Blamelist: wmeier
BUILD FAILED: failed failed slave
