Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bug 2066: GtkCombo: Conversion Status

2008-01-28 Thread Sake Blok
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:14:19AM -0500, Bill Meier wrote: > Ulf Lamping wrote: > > This seems to be a bug in the GTK libraries, we should simply "go back" > > to the old GTK version that works and put some pressure on the GTK guys > > (the bug report seems to be written already). > > Bottom Li

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ip.addr != 10.0.0.1 (Guy Harris)

2008-01-28 Thread Kenichi Okuyama
Dear John, Sorry to interrupt you. I simply want to make sure. You mean, in current implementation: a) ( ip.addr == 1.2.3.4 ) means (( ip.src == 1.2.3.4 )||( ip.dst == 1.2.3.4 )). b) ( ip.addr != 1.2.3.4 ) means (( ip.src != 1.2.3.4 )||( ip.dst != 1.2.3.4 )) which stands for !(( ip.src == 1.2

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ip.addr != 10.0.0.1 (Guy Harris)

2008-01-28 Thread John McDermott
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 05:01:01 -0700, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ip.addr == 1.2.3.4 means "show me only packets where the address 1.2.3.4 appears in *some* IP header" ip.addr != 1.2.3.4 means "show me only packets where the address in some IP header is not 1.2.3.4" > Is there any known case w

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Portig TShark from Red Hat to WRLinux problem

2008-01-28 Thread Sébastien Tandel
Hi, if you've downloaded the source form the SVN, you have first to do ./autogen.sh Regards, Sebastien Tandel On Jan 25, 2008 9:44 AM, Michal N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am going to port TShark from RedHat to Wind River Linux and I have > problems. > > I need two kinds of paths f

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2226] New: Mismatching element in a PDML explort

2008-01-28 Thread Martin Mathieson
In order to conform to the schema, we'd need to insist that items were always added inside protocol trees, and not directly in to the top-level tree passed to dissectors. The TCP dissector writes unparsed data into the top-level tree. I know that I also added an ARP entry to the top-level tree (i

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bug 2066: GtkCombo: Conversion Status

2008-01-28 Thread Bill Meier
> Bill Meier schrieb: >> I've been going through all the GtkCombo usages and understanding exactly how >> >>I'm leaning towards writing wrapper functions which >> provide the combo functionality required by Wireshark in terms of either >> GtkCombo or GtkComboBox. >> >> I haven't quite finished c

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ip.addr != 10.0.0.1

2008-01-28 Thread Sake Blok
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 09:23:40PM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote: > Stig Bj??rlykke wrote: > > > > We often get questions why the filter "ip.addr != 10.0.0.1" does not > > work as expected. > > > > Is it a good idea to make some sort of special handling for filters > > like "ip.addr", "tcp.port" and "