On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 04:27:34PM -0500, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> Should tshark be installed setuid root if you use
> --enable-setuid-install ? I thought not but using that option will
> install both setuid root. (I thought I had played with the new privsep
> stuff but apparently I hadn't packag
Should tshark be installed setuid root if you use
--enable-setuid-install ? I thought not but using that option will
install both setuid root. (I thought I had played with the new privsep
stuff but apparently I hadn't packaged it up.)
___
Wireshark-
I'm proud to announce the release of Wireshark 0.99.7. I'm also proud to
announce Sharkfest '08, the first-ever Wireshark users and developers
conference, and SharkNet, an enterprise maintenance and support program for
Wireshark.
Shameless Promotion
Sharkfest '08 will be held March 31 to Apri
My suggestion is to do nothing about it right now. The question of how
the Ethernet dissector hands off dissection to the heuristically
registered sub-dissectors has been asked and answered.
As for WOL dissection, although it's true that a MagicPacket could occur
any Ethertype or in any other su
I found the same book, and found the passage being referred to here. It
is in section 20.6.4.
Tomas, are you planning to issuing a patch? Has .7 progressed too far
along the release cycle to have this change applied there?
thanks,
--roger
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mail
Maynard, Chris wrote:
> Then there's the downside of changing the existing behavior - meaning
> pretty much every packet will have to be scanned to determine if it
> contains the MagicPacket or not since theoretically, the MagicPacket can
> occur within ANY packet (i.e., ANY Ethertype).
However,
Michael A. McCartney wrote:
> Changing it to what we discussed would break what I have
> and worst, probably would force me to hack packet-eth which
> I'd rather not do. Seems eth is a special case where both
> the "framing" needs to be heuristic (as is now and used) as
> well as the "payload" (n
Hi,
it is fixed with revision 23916.
Tomas
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Sergio Mayoral
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 10:32 AM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] ASN.1 enumeratio
Hi,
I am also having this problem. I found a book called
"ASN.1 Communication between Heterogeneous Systems"
written by Olivier Dubuisson, who looks to be an
expert on ASN.1, where it is explicitly said:
- If the ENUMERATED type is extensible (or if the
module includes the EXTENSIBILITY IMPLIED c
