Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback

2007-11-11 Thread Maynard, Chris
UPX indicates "very fast decompression", but there's bound to be some time penalty vs. not compressing the executable. Nevertheless, it seems worth doing to me as well - at least trying it out to compare the difference in installation time, space, etc. And if the executable decompresses as fas

Re: [Wireshark-dev] VALS

2007-11-11 Thread Maynard, Chris
It's hard to tell why it's not working without some code to look at it. At a minimum, what does your value_string array look like, how are you attempting to add the "cnp code" to your flags_tree, and what is the hf_register_info array entry where VALS is used? You should have something like t

[Wireshark-dev] VALS

2007-11-11 Thread khalid habibi
Hi When Bitweise decoding, I wille an issue as follows: The decoding is for 0x00 like: --- 0 ... : Flag 1: Not Set .0 .. : Flag 2: Not Set .. 0 : Flag 3: Not Set ... 0 : CODE: (0x00) CNP -- If CODE (lezte 5 bits) = 0 (0x00) i

Re: [Wireshark-dev] The COPYING file (our license) is a mess!

2007-11-11 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:25:18PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote: > While i was updating the NSIS installer, I had a look at the current > COPYING file and was pretty sad reading the following preamble to the > GPL: > Unfortunately, this text spreads a lot FUD and it is redundant. > > IMHO, the GPLv2

[Wireshark-dev] The COPYING file (our license) is a mess!

2007-11-11 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi List! While i was updating the NSIS installer, I had a look at the current COPYING file and was pretty sad reading the following preamble to the GPL: > Wireshark is distributed under the GNU GPL. There are no restrictions > on its use. There are significant restrictions on its distributio

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win32 packaging: WinPcap installer updated to 4.0.2 - does the U3 and PortableApps packaging need updates as well?

2007-11-11 Thread Graeme Lunt
Ulf, > I've just updated the WinPcap installer to the recent 4.0.2 release. > > Could the U3 and PortableApps maintainers have a look if they need to do > something? I think the WinPcap installer is derived from the NSIS packaging for both U3 and PortableApps packaging, but I'll check - and fix i

[Wireshark-dev] Win32 packaging: WinPcap installer updated to 4.0.2 - does the U3 and PortableApps packaging need updates as well?

2007-11-11 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! I've just updated the WinPcap installer to the recent 4.0.2 release. Could the U3 and PortableApps maintainers have a look if they need to do something? Regards, ULFL ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback

2007-11-11 Thread Ulf Lamping
Graeme Lunt schrieb: > An hour - wow. Maybe I should add something to the installation wizard > to indicate that it could take quite a while! PortableApps recommend > compressing exes/dlls with UPX (http://upx.sourceforge.net/) - but I > haven't looked at how much of a difference this makes yet. >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback

2007-11-11 Thread Graeme Lunt
Chris, On 09/11/2007, Maynard, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI: I was finally able to build & test a PortableApps version of Wireshark. > The SVN version I used was 23398. Initially when I built it and tried to run > it off a USB flash drive, it failed due to some "unspecified error".