After reporting that SVN 22981 had a Windows build problem, I wanted to make
sure I had the latest available version before calling it quits for tonight, so
I ran another "svn update". I thought it strange that 6 files needed to be
restored, as follows:
C:\svn\wirshark>svn update
Restored 'as
Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 6.00.9782.0
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.
cl -DWIN32 -DNULL=0 -D_MT -D_DLL -WX -DHAVE_CONFIG_H /I. /I.. /I../.. /I
C:\wireshark-win32-libs\glib\include\glib-2.0 /IC:\wireshark-win32-libs\glib\li
b\glib-2.0\i
On Sep 25, 2007, at 2:31 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> using "case 10 ... 127:" is *not* portable!!!
I've checked in a change that should fix that, as well as a change to
the Portability section of doc/README.developer adding it to the long
list of GCCisms to avoid.
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=22961
>
> User: jake
> Date: 2007/09/25 07:42 PM
>
> Log:
> From Gerrit Renker:
> This is an update for the DCCP dissector and has previously been sent to
> the DCCP dissector maintainer, Francesco Fond
On Sep 25, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Heude Pascal wrote:
> Is there a possibility to have a browse (file) button with a string
> in the preferences windows in order to select a file using in a
> dissector ?
Currently, no. There should probably be a preference type of
"pathname", which is like a s
Hi,
Is there a possibility to have a browse (file) button with a string in
the preferences windows in order to select a file using in a dissector ?
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wire
Hi Jaap
Thanks a lot! Will try it out.
Ming
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 19:52 +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> mergecap is your friend here.
>
> Thanx,
> Jaap
>
> Ming Zhang wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I wonder whether wireshark has this feature.
> >
> > I am doing some tcp/ip analysis between 1
Hi,
mergecap is your friend here.
Thanx,
Jaap
Ming Zhang wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I wonder whether wireshark has this feature.
>
> I am doing some tcp/ip analysis between 1 client and 1 server. I capture
> the trace from both boxes. Now wonder if wireshark or any other tool can
> examine both trace
Hi,
Fixed Committed revision 22956.
/Anders
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Maynard, Chris
Skickat: den 25 september 2007 18:24
Till: Developer support list for Wireshark
Ämne: [Wireshark-dev] SVN 22952 Windows build is broken
FYI: The Windo
FYI: The Windows build is broken with SVN 22952. It seems to be due to
an unreferenced local variable in packet-ldap-template.c at line 1330,
namely "gss_len". Below is the relevant output.
- Chris (a.k.a., "The human Windows buildbot")
Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 6.00.
Hi,
I have added GTK+ 2.12 for Windows please run the setup script.
Best regards
Anders
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
On 9/25/07, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an update for the DCCP dissector and has previously been
[cut]
Hi Gerrit/all,
I was not aware of "bugzilla-based" new submission
procedure, sorry.
I have created bug report #1865 and I have set the
"review_for_checkin" flag... hope I
This is an update for the DCCP dissector and has previously been sent to
the DCCP dissector maintainer, Francesco Fondelli, (CC:ed), who supplied
the Acked-by.
I have been using it with profit for several weeks.
This patch provides the following extensions:
* type-dependent decoding of feature-ne
Hi All
I wonder whether wireshark has this feature.
I am doing some tcp/ip analysis between 1 client and 1 server. I capture
the trace from both boxes. Now wonder if wireshark or any other tool can
examine both traces at same time and "merge" them together. For "merge"
I meant it shows us somethi
FF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1865: DCCP Dissector: Feature-Negotiation options, updates, and decoding
CCID3 options
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1865
--- Additional Comments from FF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
please check it in
__
> OK, committed. I'll start working on the remaining protocols
> tonight, so
> if you want to convert some yourself, go ahead, I'll do
> what's left :-)
>
Hello Joerg,
it fails somewhere (see buildbot):
make[2]: Entering directory
`/media/GeraldsHome/buildbot/bb-wireshark/trunk/ubuntu510x86/bu
> I write plugin for decode rtp-traffic encoded with G729.
> I need to store payload from trace. That's why a menu item
should be inserted into Statistics menu.
BTW what about introducing some plugin mechanism for codecs?
E.g. similar to
http://openh323.cvs.sourceforge.net/openh323/
>
> Hi,
> Have you tried to add your G729 codec to the codecs used by the
> RTPplayer? If you do that there should be no need
> for extara menus.
> Best regards
> Anders
>
> I don't use RTPplayer. i decode payload in plugin into wave file
>If all you need is to store the payload from a single RTP
Hello,
I want to get the name of my device in capture->interfaces
> As long as you've modified libpcap/WinPcap so that pcap_findalldevs() adds
your device to the list of available > devices, it should be displayed in
Capture -> Interfaces and in the drop-down list in Capture -> Options.
I also
If all you need is to store the payload from a single RTP stream to a file,
consider Statistics > RTP > Show all Streams > Save As.
This will save the payload along with timing information to a file in
rtpdump format.
see http://wiki.wireshark.org/rtpdump
Br,
Lars Ruoff
_
Hi,
Have you tried to add your G729 codec to the codecs used by the
RTPplayer? If you do that there should be no need
for extara menus.
Best regards
Anders
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 25 september 2007
>
> > what do I suppose to do to know how add submenu into wireshark menu
> > from plugin
>
> It is possible to add things to the statistics menu from a plug-in, but
> there is no simple method for adding a new menu from a plug-in. What
> are you trying to add to the menus?
>
>
> Steve
I write p
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:59:22AM +0200, Kukosa, Tomas wrote:
> It looks OK.
> It could be important in some cases what is the order of ASN.1 input
> files.
> I think it could be solved when such a case occurs.
OK, committed. I'll start working on the remaining protocols tonight, so
if you want t
> >
> > The question is what should be the order if "$(ASN_FILE_LIST)
> > $(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST)" or "$(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST) $(ASN_FILE_LIST)".
>
> In the past it was $(ASN..) $(EXT_ASN...).
>
> If it's OK I'll commit v2 plus this change.
>
It looks OK.
It could be important in some cases what is
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:49:13AM +0200, Kukosa, Tomas wrote:
> the $(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST) should be used somewhere in the Makefile.inc
> and Makefile.inc.nmake
> Probably
> $(PYTHON) "../../tools/asn2wrs.py" \
> $(A2W_FLAGS) \
> -p $(PROTOCOL_NAME) \
>
send your dissectors to the mailing list and someone will review it and give
suggestions on what is portable and what needs fixing.
once the dissector is in the mainline codebase it will be built and verified
on windows hosts that are part of the buildfarm
On 9/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL P
Hi,
the $(EXT_ASN_FILE_LIST) should be used somewhere in the Makefile.inc
and Makefile.inc.nmake
Probably
$(PYTHON) "../../tools/asn2wrs.py" \
$(A2W_FLAGS) \
-p $(PROTOCOL_NAME) \
-c $(PROTOCOL_NAME).cnf \
-s packet-$(PROTOC
27 matches
Mail list logo
