Re: [Wireshark-dev] Graphs and Values

2007-08-29 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:38:04PM -0400, Nandakumar Muthuraj wrote: > In the IO graphs I can get graphical display of a particular field, is > it posibble to get numerical value of this sum ? It is not possible at this time. You may file a bug report to request this feature be added at http://b

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Simple sniffer using wireshark's code

2007-08-29 Thread yin sun
you already got tcp payload, assemble them yourself by port, you got http, ftp and so on. to see how wireshark do this kind of assembling is much harder. /Yin On 8/29/07, José María Polvorosa Amor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello everybody! > First of all, Apologize for the inconvenience, I k

[Wireshark-dev] Graphs and Values

2007-08-29 Thread Nandakumar Muthuraj
Hi all, In the IO graphs I can get graphical display of a particular field, is it posibble to get numerical value of this sum ? -- Regards Nanda. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:26 PM

[Wireshark-dev] review_for_checkin granted: [Bug 1741] Privilege separation patch

2007-08-29 Thread bugzilla-request-daemon
Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has granted Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s request for review_for_checkin: Bug 1741: Privilege separation patch http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 --- Additional Comments from Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Checked in. No on to Vista

[Wireshark-dev] review_for_checkin denied: [Bug 1741] Privilege separation patch

2007-08-29 Thread bugzilla-request-daemon
Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has denied Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s request for review_for_checkin: Bug 1741: Privilege separation patch http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wiresh

[Wireshark-dev] review_for_checkin requested: [Bug 1811] New WiMAX ASN Control Protocol (WIMAXASNCP) Dissector

2007-08-29 Thread bugzilla-request-daemon
Stephen Croll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin: Bug 1811: New WiMAX ASN Control Protocol (WIMAXASNCP) Dissector http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1811 --- Additional Comments from Stephen Croll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> My employer has chosen *not* to provide a

[Wireshark-dev] review_for_checkin requested: [Bug 1751] Direction info missing for Bluetooth H4 captures in pcap-format

2007-08-29 Thread bugzilla-request-daemon
Allan M. Madsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin: Bug 1751: Direction info missing for Bluetooth H4 captures in pcap-format http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1751 ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark

[Wireshark-dev] review_for_checkin cancelled: [Bug 1751] Direction info missing for Bluetooth H4 captures in pcap-format

2007-08-29 Thread bugzilla-request-daemon
Allan M. Madsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has cancelled Allan M. Madsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s request for review_for_checkin: Bug 1751: Direction info missing for Bluetooth H4 captures in pcap-format http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1751 ___ W

Re: [Wireshark-dev] SNMP/MIBs TO DO

2007-08-29 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
Den 27. aug. 2007 kl. 00.21 skrev Luis EG Ontanon: > - There are others that attempt to be registered with "funky" oid > strings "dop.agreement.2.5.19.1" or "x411.extension-attribute.27" > which are not resolvable (I tried to fix these but they come from deep > into asn2wrs and I could not figure

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 22586: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-ip.c

2007-08-29 Thread Martin Mathieson
On 8/24/07, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Especially as its such a lower-layer protocol. I think the best thing may > be either: > - just revert my change, or maybe > - add something to the long text indicating that its 13 bits > OK, I did the 2nd option (i.e. don't use remove bi

[Wireshark-dev] Simple sniffer using wireshark's code

2007-08-29 Thread José María Polvorosa Amor
Hello everybody! First of all, Apologize for the inconvenience, I know there'll be people who don't mind my doubts. Well, I'm a student and for my final project my tutor decided to do a kind of sniffer. Particularly, I have a net with four PCs, each one with 5 ethernet cards. All PCs have intern

Re: [Wireshark-dev] finish of dissecting

2007-08-29 Thread Luis EG Ontanon
For a dissector there's no such thing like a last packet, the dissector has to behave as if another packet was to come. For a tap listener there's neither sucha concept it has to behave as there could still be more packets coming. Ususally tap listeners are made arround two calls one that takes ca

[Wireshark-dev] finish of dissecting

2007-08-29 Thread Илья Куделин
Hi. Tell me please, how can i know that wireshark is finished dissecting packets in trace, when trace load into wireshark? i write plugin, and i need know then last packet from trace was processed. -- С уважением, Илья Куделин mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq# 154801384 jabberID