While compiling recently after a distclean on Windows XP, I noticed the
following compiler "notes". Perhaps the conflicting defines in
packet-dceprc-winreg.h should be renamed?
- Chris
packet-dcerpc-winreg.c
packet-dcerpc-winreg.h(18) : note C6311: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
Studio\VC9
FYI: The SVN 22651 build is failing on Windows XP with the following errors:
libwireshark.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
add_oid_name
libwireshark.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
add_oid_str_name
libwireshark.def
Chris Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for
review_for_checkin:
Bug 1767: packet-3com-xns.c display filter field problems
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1767
--- Additional Comments from Chris Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This updated patch obsoletes the first one and o
I need feedback as these are many changes...
I know it compiles on my mac (without libsmi) and works at least for snmp.
I do not know if it compiles on windows and I might not be able to
know till monday (the buildbot appears hung :-/ ), so someone should
please tell me.
Other than that I need
Stig Bjørlykke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has granted Shaun Jackman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s request for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1793: mp2t: Call the mpeg-pes dissector
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1793
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark
Stig Bjørlykke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has granted Munenori Ohuchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s request for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1790: packet-cisco-erspan.c enhancements
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1790
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wiresh
Hello,
I am using LUA to make a dissector. I would like to modify informations
in the info column of the wirshark display but the following code does
not seem to work. I have not found an example for this. I would be
grateful to anyone for some help.
Thanks in advance.
--
Stig Bjørlykke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has granted Todd J Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s request for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1792: ISIS dissector does not decode Restart Signaling CLVs correctly
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1792
___
Wiresh
It's compiling OK now, but it's hanging on one of the capture tests.
Jeff Morriss wrote:
> I hope so, but it appears to have worked before my change and not after,
> so... I'm a bit nervous.
>
> Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
>> The question is can winpcap capture on a virtual interface of a virtual
>
>
> > I think it's much more easy to read the leading text and the value if
> > the details of the bitfields does not start the line. Ofcourse my
> > personal opinion, but mostly I do not care about the bits.
> >
After committing this I wondered if it was worth it, i.e. it makes the
display less
Does someone knows which RFC describes the use of PIBs and COPS relation to SMI?
Given the fact that I'll had to get my hands into the COPS dissector
(to have it using the new oids infrastructure so we can finally drop
net-snmp) and I've never seen a packet of this protocol I would need
someone to
Stig Bjørlykke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has granted Stig Bjørlykke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s request for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1763: IO Graphs: frames missing from the graph
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1763
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
W
Ulf,
First - Great stuff! I finally got around to adding this to a proprietary
dissector to try it out. For example, in a small capture file of around 15000
packets, I wanted to pick out 5 particular packets of interest. This could
have been accomplished by searching for these packets of
I'm assuming when I do the verify_tools step, it confirms that I'm using
nmake/cl/link from VS8 based on the output:
C:\wireshark>nmake -f Makefile.nmake verify_tools
Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 8.00.50727.42
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Todd J Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1794: OSPF dissector does not decode TLVs in a Grace LSA
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1794
--- Additional Comments from Todd J Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix a trailing comma for portability reasons
Todd J Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has cancelled Todd J Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s request for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1794: OSPF dissector does not decode TLVs in a Grace LSA
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1794
--- Additional Comments from Todd J Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just submitted a patch to bug #1793 (mp2t: Call the mpeg-pes
dissector) that allows the MPEG TS dissector (mp2t) to call the MPEG
PES dissector (mpeg-pes). It doesn't support any desegmentation yet,
but that can wait for a future patch, and it still useful just as is.
To get an idea of how the PE
Todd J Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1794: OSPF dissector does not decode TLVs in a Grace LSA
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1794
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www
Todd J Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1792: ISIS dissector does not decode Restart Signaling CLVs correctly
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1792
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.o
Yes, with the latest drop, it fixes the bug...!!!
Thanks a lot!
JM
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Luis EG Ontanon
Envoyé : Friday, August 24, 2007 10:44 AM
À : Developer support list for Wireshark
Objet : Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding Cap
I hope so, but it appears to have worked before my change and not after,
so... I'm a bit nervous.
Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
> The question is can winpcap capture on a virtual interface of a virtual
> machine?
>
> I think it is waiting for a click (as it happened already in the past).
>
> I thin
The question is can winpcap capture on a virtual interface of a virtual machine?
I think it is waiting for a click (as it happened already in the past).
I think tests that assume anything being available on the system
should be run with by a special target but not by the "all" target.
Luis
On 8
Gerald Combs wrote:
> Graham Bloice wrote:
>> The buildbot is reporting a permission problem.
>
> It looks like the GUI crashed during the "capture 10 packets" test, and
> Windows popped up the "Wireshark has encountered a problem..." dialog.
> I'll tweak the error reporting settings on the buil
This (I think) is related to
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1757
can you download a recent snapshot and verify if it gets rid of the problem?
if not can you open a bug for it?
Thanks
On 8/24/07, Audet, Jean-Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am
Hi,
I am currently adding a capture engine to sniff i2c traffic.
I am currently adding this code into Linux using the pcap_linux
mechanism (like Bluetooth and USB).
My question is (and I am not currently sure if it's Wireshark or
libpcap) why do I get calls to my function xx
Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
> On 8/24/07, Richard van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Richard van der Hoff wrote:
>>> Ok. I still don't have an oid_to_subid_buf, though :(
>> Right. For now, I have cut and pasted the old oid_to_subid_buf into
>> oid_resolv.c. This at least has made things build a
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 01:54:05PM +0200, Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
> I think you re-generated packet-snmp.c .
No, I did. I change d the parameterlist of a function that was used in
packet-snmp.c and normally the right way to do this is to change the
source files and regenereate the dissctor. Normall
Hi,
I'm wondering how hard it is to implement Wireshark's "Follow TCP Stream"
feature. Basically, I need to do this myself because 1. I have large data
files that Wireshark can't handle and 2. I need to do this automatically,
because there are a large number of streams in the data. What I would li
On 8/24/07, Richard van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard van der Hoff wrote:
> > Ok. I still don't have an oid_to_subid_buf, though :(
> Right. For now, I have cut and pasted the old oid_to_subid_buf into
> oid_resolv.c. This at least has made things build again.
there is oid_encoded2
Richard van der Hoff wrote:
> Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
>> I think you re-generated packet-snmp.c .
>>
>> I I haven't checked in neither the regenerated packet-snmp.c nor the
>> changes in the makefiles or other files that (will) depend on oids.c
>> to build. I plan doing so this weekend.
>>
>> Since
Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
> I think you re-generated packet-snmp.c .
>
> I I haven't checked in neither the regenerated packet-snmp.c nor the
> changes in the makefiles or other files that (will) depend on oids.c
> to build. I plan doing so this weekend.
>
> Since you are already there, you could he
I think you re-generated packet-snmp.c .
I I haven't checked in neither the regenerated packet-snmp.c nor the
changes in the makefiles or other files that (will) depend on oids.c
to build. I plan doing so this weekend.
Since you are already there, you could help me out, can you add oids.c
and oid
Richard van der Hoff wrote:
> I'm seeing
>
> epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `oid_to_subid_buf'
> epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `oid_get_from_encoded'
> epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `oid_resolved'
> epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined
I'm seeing
epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `oid_to_subid_buf'
epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `oid_get_from_encoded'
epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `oid_resolved'
epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `oid_subid2string'
on the
exceptions.OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied:
'C:\\buildbot\\wireshark\\trunk\\winxpx86\\build\\test\\test.sh'
--
Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should rea
Gerald Combs wrote:
> Graham Bloice wrote:
>> The buildbot is reporting a permission problem.
>
> It looks like the GUI crashed during the "capture 10 packets" test, and
> Windows popped up the "Wireshark has encountered a problem..." dialog.
> I'll tweak the error reporting settings on the buil
Maynard, Chris wrote:
> OK, I will start submitting bugs and patches for each one individually as I
> find time.
Note that the problems you're finding aren't specific to a particular
platform, so the "Hardware" and "OS" fields should be "All".
___
Wire
Hello,
I have coded 2 plugins for wireshark. I builded them on a system which i
configured with "configure --disable-gtk2". When I copy these compiled plugins
to another system which doesn't have glibc in version 2.4 and start "tshark -v"
then tshark loads one plugin but not the other. The erro
Hi.
i need to store rtp_payload from trace. i look at
/gtk/rtp_player.c. i found function
static void
rtp_stream_value_destroy(gpointer rsi_arg)
{
rtp_stream_info_t *rsi = rsi_arg;
...
}
can somebody explain to me how it works, i mean, i don't understand how can
i get ptr rsi_arg.
--
С уважением,
however, thanx for your help
Unfortunately, I can't help answering this question (yet)... perhaps
> someone else has the answer.
>
> On 8/23/07, Илья Куделин <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > thanx for links, i found some functions.
> > but new question is arise. how can i know the sequense numbe
40 matches
Mail list logo
