dissectors/.libs/libasndissectors.a(packet-ansi_tcap.o) definition of
_tcap_private in section (__DATA,__common)
dissectors/.libs/libasndissectors.a(packet-tcap.o) definition of _tcap_private
in section (__DATA,__common)
/usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed
Regards, ULFL
Neil Piercy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1745: dissection of encrypted SRTP payloads and SRTCP unhelpful
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1745
--- Additional Comments from Neil Piercy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch set provides a an API for out o
On 8/15/07, Andrew Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would make more sense to me to use something equivalent to:
>
> smidump -f identifiers -o .oid
>
> than have one file. It means the user only has to generate the oid
> mapping for new MIBs, rather than rebuilding an entire database, at the
>
Gerald Combs schrieb:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Joerg Mayer schrieb:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 02:58:10PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
I've submitted a patch which implements some of the changes discussed at
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/PrivilegeSeparation . If no one
has any o
ronnie sahlberg schrieb:
> On 8/15/07, ronnie sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good.
>>
>> In particular doing this for the LocallyAdministrated would make sense
>> since many active/passive cluster implementations pick a MAC address
>> to represent the active node by
>> taking th
Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
> libsmi (that is going to be the one) has a rich collection of MIBs.
> We could ask them whether or not we can redistribute them.
libsmi's MIB collection have been editted to correct syntactic errors.
libsmi's parser is MUCH more picky than net-snmp's parser. I ran the
com
Jeff Morriss wrote:
> If this is the default then the release notes for the next release
> better have a *really big* notice about that fact. (Imagine admins who
> install Wireshark for their own use but have absolutely no intention of
> letting mere mortals sniff the traffic. We don't want th
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Joerg Mayer schrieb:
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 02:58:10PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
>>
>>> I've submitted a patch which implements some of the changes discussed at
>>> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/PrivilegeSeparation . If no one
>>> has any objections I'd like to
Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 02:58:10PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
>
>> I've submitted a patch which implements some of the changes discussed
>> at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/PrivilegeSeparation . If no
>> one has any objections I'd like to check it in later this week
Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1741: Privilege separation patch
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1741
--- Additional Comments from Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've set the default --enable-setuid-install back to "no" and included
Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has cancelled Gerald Combs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s request for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1741: Privilege separation patch
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1741
--- Additional Comments from Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've set the default --en
On 8/15/07, ronnie sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds good.
>
> In particular doing this for the LocallyAdministrated would make sense
> since many active/passive cluster implementations pick a MAC address
> to represent the active node by
> taking the MAC address of the primary NIC of th
Sounds good.
In particular doing this for the LocallyAdministrated would make sense
since many active/passive cluster implementations pick a MAC address
to represent the active node by
taking the MAC address of the primary NIC of the primary node and then
setting the locally administrated bit, to
Joerg Mayer schrieb:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:25:20PM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
>> I've implemented an experimental change in epan/addr_resolv.c, which strips
>> down both flags before doing the actual manuf resolvings - which is working
>> well:
>>
>> 04:05:06 -> Xerox
>> 05:05:06 -> Xe
Luis EG Ontanon schrieb:
> libsmi (that is going to be the one) has a rich collection of MIBs.
> We could ask them whether or not we can redistribute them.
>
The following page lists the MIBs they already have included:
http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/libsmi/mibs.html?lang=de. This
include
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:25:20PM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> The current Ethernet manuf name resolving (resolve the manufacturer name -
> the first three bytes of the Ethernet address, e.g. 04:05:06 -> Xerox)
> doesn't work if the address uses the Ethernet broadcast or locally
> administered f
Joerg Mayer schrieb:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 02:58:10PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
>
>> I've submitted a patch which implements some of the changes discussed at
>> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/PrivilegeSeparation . If no one
>> has any objections I'd like to check it in later this wee
libsmi (that is going to be the one) has a rich collection of MIBs.
We could ask them whether or not we can redistribute them.
On 8/14/07, Ulf Lamping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List!
>
> The current Wireshark distribution comes with some example SNMP MIBs (is this
> true only for Win32?).
Hi List!
The current Wireshark distribution comes with some example SNMP MIBs (is this
true only for Win32?). It seems to me, that these MIBs are coming from the
net-snmp package.
I would like to add some more MIBs, e.g. the rmon2.mib.
As there currently seems to be some discussion, if we wan
Hi,
Checked in.
Please note that the new way of sending patches is through bugzilla.
This to make sure patches, like these, don't end up being overlooked.
Thanx,
Jaap
Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please find enclosed a patch to update BA status code for PMIPv6
> according to draft-ietf-net
Hi List!
The current Ethernet manuf name resolving (resolve the manufacturer name - the
first three bytes of the Ethernet address, e.g. 04:05:06 -> Xerox) doesn't work
if the address uses the Ethernet broadcast or locally administered flags (see
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Ethernet?highlight=%28e
Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Oh no, not this flamewar again...
>
> On the plus side: yes, your development cycle and intermediate release
> is easier.
> On the min side: You don't have the full API (on Win32 that is).
It certainly wasn't my intention to start a flame war, I just hadn't
seen the argumen
Hi,
please find enclosed a patch to update BA status code for PMIPv6
according to draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-01 Section 8.5
Regards,
Nicolas Dichtel
--- wireshark-0.99.6/epan/dissectors/packet-mip6.h 2007-08-14 15:34:15.624956676 +0200
+++ wireshark-0.99.6-new/epan/dissectors/packet-mip6.h 2007
Hi everyone,
WHile doing "make" in wireshark, i encounter the following problem:
/usr/local/lib/libwireshark.so: file not recorgnize: file format not recorgnize
This happen when it is trying to build the plugin. ( agentx ) plugin. I dont
make any changes in this plugins.
THank for all ya help
Gerald Combs wrote:
> I've submitted a patch which implements some of the changes discussed at
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/PrivilegeSeparation . If no one
> has any objections I'd like to check it in later this week.
Whoo-hoo! Go Gerald! Thanks for finishing the work on that. :-)
(
Luis,
On 13/08/07, Luis EG Ontanon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I been thinking about the fact that Wireshark does not really need a
> MIB parser. It just needs to know OIDs, their name and their type.
>
> So I believe we should use a flat file that contains these three
> fields and provide the us
BTW to get back to our actual problem, I think that for both Yapp add
PIDL the licensing issue is non-relevant. As We distribute them as
tools for building the program, I believe it to be mere agregation.
A very different issue is the stub code generated by PIDL itself that
goes to the dissectors,
Carles Kishimoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for
review_for_checkin:
Bug 1743: Bug in LLDP Auto-Negotiation field bitmasks
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1743
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wir
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 01:43:58PM +0100, Richard van der Hoff wrote:
>> Joerg Mayer wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:05:44AM +0200, Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
YAPP's Driver is either GPL or Artistic .
http://search.cpan.org/~fdesar/Parse-Y
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 02:58:10PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
> I've submitted a patch which implements some of the changes discussed at
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/PrivilegeSeparation . If no one
> has any objections I'd like to check it in later this week.
I'm afraid you lost me with
30 matches
Mail list logo
