Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building wireshark-0.99.6 problems on Linux

2007-08-04 Thread Guy Harris
Fabrizio Bertocci wrote: > [2] The RPM build still fail because apparently the man pages are now > installed under $PREFIX/share/man instead of $PREFIX/man. > The workaround is, again, to change the SPEC file (same as above), > replacing the line: > %prefix/man/*/* > into: > %prefix/share/man/*/

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building wireshark-0.99.6 problems on Linux

2007-08-04 Thread Guy Harris
Fabrizio Bertocci wrote: > [1] When building a rpm package, the rpm build fails because of a > warning that is treated as error (when it should not be!). > The problem is reported in: wiretap/file_access.c (line 993) (the > warning is about passing a 'const' pointer to gzwrite that is declared

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ../../epan/dissectors/packet-per.h:37: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'asn1_ctx_t'

2007-08-04 Thread yin sun
That doesn't make sense, as 1. the packet-per.h itself uses types defined in asn1.h 2. it will break any dissectors's build that use packet-per before 0.99.6. /Yin On 8/4/07, Stephen Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 04:39:57PM -0400, yin sun wrote: > > > the epan/

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFC: Get rid of individual configure for wiretap directory

2007-08-04 Thread Guy Harris
Joerg Mayer wrote: > I'd like to merge the configuration for the wiretap subdir in Wireshark > with the main configuruation. This will: > a) speed up the build process a bit > b) solve the problem we ran into with the runflex.sh script. c) get rid of a bunch of other duplication (the wiretap conf

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building wireshark-0.99.6 problems on Linux

2007-08-04 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:42:30AM +0200, Radek Vok??l wrote: > Fabrizio Bertocci wrote: > > [3] On RedHat Enterprise 3, CentOS 3, and RedHat 9 the build fails > > because the file: > > gtk/export-object.c > > uses some functions that are available only on GTK 2.4 and above. > > > > The correct fi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ../../epan/dissectors/packet-per.h:37: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'asn1_ctx_t'

2007-08-04 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 04:39:57PM -0400, yin sun wrote: > the epan/dissectors/packet-per.h is missing this #include > You should place that include in your dissector code as we typically do not include other headers from within header files in Wireshark. Steve _

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Holding state between packets for an encryption protocol?

2007-08-04 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:57:06AM -0500, David Zarlengo wrote: > I'm looking at writing my first dissector for a protocol which > generates a session key to encrypt the remaining packets. > > Where can I store this session key so that it's available for > subsequent packets? You can store the k

Re: [Wireshark-dev] decoding java object stream

2007-08-04 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:14:51AM -0400, yin sun wrote: > The other way is, as I know the whole TCP stream is dedicated for this > java object stream, so in theory I just need to reassemble all of them > into one big buffer. Then the question is, > 1. for static file (packets captured already),

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFC: Get rid of individual configure for wiretap directory

2007-08-04 Thread Luis EG Ontanon
votes++; On 8/4/07, Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to merge the configuration for the wiretap subdir in Wireshark > with the main configuruation. This will: > a) speed up the build process a bit > b) solve the problem we ran into with the runflex.sh script. > > Are t

[Wireshark-dev] RFC: Get rid of individual configure for wiretap directory

2007-08-04 Thread Joerg Mayer
Hello, I'd like to merge the configuration for the wiretap subdir in Wireshark with the main configuruation. This will: a) speed up the build process a bit b) solve the problem we ran into with the runflex.sh script. Are there any compelling reasons not to do this? If not, I'll do this next weeke

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 22450: /trunk/ /trunk/tools/: runlex.sh /trunk/wiretap/: runlex.sh

2007-08-04 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 01:06:44AM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: > > Why are there two (currently still) identical instances of the script? > > Because Wiretap is currently treated as an independent library, unlike > libwireshark which is treated as a part of Wireshark. This means that, > for exampl

Re: [Wireshark-dev] XML Decoding

2007-08-04 Thread Luis EG Ontanon
revision 22454 adds prefs for a tcp.port range and heuristic dissecction of tcp payload. On 8/2/07, Luis EG Ontanon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A tcp.port (range) and/or to register the heuristic dissector for > those cases where there's not necessarily a known port > > On 8/2/07, Jeff Morriss <[

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 22450: /trunk/ /trunk/tools/: runlex.sh /trunk/wiretap/: runlex.sh

2007-08-04 Thread Guy Harris
Joerg Mayer wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 03:27:19AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Directory: /trunk/tools/ >> ChangesPath Action >> +1 -1 runlex.sh Modified >> >> Directory: /trunk/wiretap/ >> ChangesPath Action >> +1 -1 runlex.sh Modifie

[Wireshark-dev] review_for_checkin requested: [Bug 1725] Enhance tcp-analysis with "reused tcp session"

2007-08-04 Thread bugzilla-request-daemon
Sake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin: Bug 1725: Enhance tcp-analysis with "reused tcp session" http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1725 --- Additional Comments from Sake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Patch to split mark tcp session reuse as such and not as "Lost Pack