Hi, I am trying to install the wireshark built with [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
another PC. But when I launch the installed wireshark.exe, it warns the
missing of msvcr80.dll. According to Matthias's advice
(http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200703/msg00628.html),
actually the issue comes
Jack Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1723: Enhamcement of text2cap for parsing flexibility
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1723
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshar
Jack Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1723: Enhamcement of text2cap for parsing flexibility
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1723
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshar
correction done in rev 22438.
thanks for the report.
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
On Aug 1, 2007, at 10:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is a mistacke in the assigned
number of the update request and update ack shim6 control message.
Accordingly to draft-ietf-shim6-proto-08 page 93 the up
David Gersic wrote:
> I can run Wireshark ok, and it seems to work great. I'm a normal
> user, so on startup it I'm prompted for root's password. That goes
> fine, and it starts and I can capture packets no problem.
Are you running it from the command line or an icon/menu on the desktop?
In or
yin sun wrote:
> Hello,
> I found out that,
> When a subdissector on top of TCP set
>if (pinfo->can_desegment) {
> pinfo->desegment_len = DESEGMENT_UNTIL_FIN;
> return;
> }
> when pinfo->can_desegment is 0 again, subdissector received the whole
> TCP stream in tvb minus
This may or may not be a bug, but I wanted to report it just in case.
I'm running Wireshark 0.99.5-5.3 here on OpenSUSE 10.2, installed from the RPM
that's on rpmfind.net. If it matters, I'm using Gnome.
I can run Wireshark ok, and it seems to work great. I'm a normal user, so on
startup it I'm
Hi,
I've spot it. I will correct it as soon as I have two minutes.
... but it is indeed better to file a bug report :)
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
On Aug 1, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
Hi,
Better file a bugreport on that.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
F
Hi,
Better file a bugreport on that.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Folks
>
> in epan/dissector/packet-ipv6.h there is a mistacke in the assigned
> number of the update request and update ack shim6 control message.
>
> Accordingly to draft-ietf-shim6-proto-08 page 93
Rodney Dawes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've drawn a set of icons[1] in the Tango[2] style. Would it be possible
> to get these icons into the wireshark source as the primary application
> icon?
I'm not opposed to changing the current icon set, but it's important to
keep an element of the Wireshark logo in
Folks
in epan/dissector/packet-ipv6.h there is a mistacke in the assigned
number of the update request and update ack shim6 control message.
Accordingly to draft-ietf-shim6-proto-08 page 93 the update request
has a value 64 and the update ack 65.
Regards
Amine Dhraief
Sorry, but I think they look quite dull.
I prefer the actual ones.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodney Dawes
Sent: mardi 31 juillet 2007 17:17
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark Logo/Icons
Hi,
I've draw
Guy Harris wrote:
> Rodney Dawes wrote:
>
>> I've drawn a set of icons[1] in the Tango[2] style. Would it be possible
>> to get these icons into the wireshark source as the primary application
>> icon?
>
> ...at least for UN*X+X11 desktops. I don't know what the "right" style
> would be for Win
13 matches
Mail list logo
