Hi,
Does anyone have experiences on building wireshark by using mingw
cross-compiler (http://www.libsdl.org/extras/win32/cross/) under linux?
Thx!
Guo
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 13:54 -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> Stephen Donnelly wrote:
> > The only alternative I can see would be assigning new DLTs on a 1:1
> > basis with ERF types, however there are already 19 ERF types defined and
> > I feel this would unnecessarily consume/pollute the lib
Mike Duigou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1712: Add 'application/json' to list of text media types
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1712
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.w
On Jul 26, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>> Also, GTK+ and GLIB were installed in /usr/local/lib
>
> It appears that the GLib test macro isn't doing enough checking, as is
> it found GLib present, which it is, but not enough of it is present to
> *compile* software that uses it.
>
> I susp
Bryant, Stephanie wrote:
> I have attached the top level "config.log"
It says
configure:24482: result: no
configure:24510: checking whether %llx can be used to format 64-bit integers
configure:24556: gcc -o conftest -D_U_="__attribute__((unused))" -g -O2
-Wall -W -Wdeclaration-after-statement -W
Stephen Donnelly wrote:
> The only alternative I can see would be assigning new DLTs on a 1:1
> basis with ERF types, however there are already 19 ERF types defined and
> I feel this would unnecessarily consume/pollute the libpcap DLT
> namespace.
One comment I have (though I am not part of tcpdum
Bryant, Stephanie wrote:
> Then, I executed the "configure" script. The configure script ends in
> the same error as before.
What are the full contents of the "config.log" files in the top-level
and wiretap directories?
What type of machine are you building this on? In particular, does it
hav
Hi,
I had not executed the "autogen.sh" script before.
This time, I started the "autogen.sh". The script completed.
Then, I executed the "configure" script. The configure script ends in
the same error as before.
Thanks for the suggestions.
Stephanie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
I've successfully built customized rpm's for Fedora Core 4 as well as
later Fedora releases, but not specifically for FC3; however, I have
also built rpm's for Red Hat 9, so in theory you should be able to build
one for FC3.
Can you verify that you first ran autogen.sh before running the
configure
Hi again,
I checked that out and found that Fedora Core 3 is quite old -
Wireshark was named "Ethereal" in those days, "Wireshark" seems to
appear in Fedora Core 6. Maybe you can try to install Ethereal,
depending what you want to analyze it might still suit your needs.
Regards,
Martin
On 7/26
Hi there!
In my dissector i display the time delta between request and reply. This works
fine on my PC so far. On some others too.
But on some machines the values from nstime_t (secs and nsecs) are switched in
some cases.
In Frame display time delta everything seems ok, but at the point of tim
Hi,
My apologies for the misspelling of the name.
However, rpm tells me that the package is not installed and
Locate only finds the source information that I downloaded.
RPM query does not find it either.
Stephanie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi,
you should have an rpm in your distribution if you're searching for
"Wireshark", not "Webshark" - provided that you're looking for a
network protocol analyzer.
Regards,
Martin
On 7/26/07, Bryant, Stephanie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
>
>
> I am a newbie administrator a
I am using gcc 3.3.5
This is the default C compiler for an old Debian Sarge distribution.
<<
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>
Jeff Morriss wrote:
> Florent Drouin wrote:
> [...]
>
>> generic_decoder.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/m
Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Checked in.
>
> Thanx,
> Jaap
>
> Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following patch decode DHCP option 121.
>> (RFC 3442)
>>
>> Output example :
>>
>> Option: (t=121,l=59) Classless Static Route
>> Option: (121) Classless Static Route
>> Length: 59
>>
15 matches
Mail list logo