Hi,
attached you'll find a short capture of three frames.
Regards,
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Ulf Lamping
Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juli 2007 21:51
An: Developer support list for Wireshark
Betreff: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bu
Problem: The DMP dissector fails to correctly decode 4 character and
longer SICs.
First reason:
There is a 32 bit overflow in the following code:
p = (gint) pow (multiplier, no_char - 1 - i); Multiplier is
either 36.0 or 74.0, and "no_char" can be as high as 8.
Second reason:
An incorre
Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> Jeff Morriss wrote:
>> A more generic question is: how are dissectors using tcp_dissect_pdus()
>> supposed to be "new style" (this dissector is now effectively no longer
>> "new style"). "packet-xot" takes one approach but it's not obvious to
>> me if that will real
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Morriss wrote:
> Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> Please find attached a new version of the patch.
>
> Checked in (rev 22383), thanks!
>
> BTW, this dissector really should be broken up into
Den 15. jul. 2007 kl. 13.10 skrev Graeme Lunt:
> Stig - can you check what I've checked in still decodes your X.400
> encoded
> TNEF?
Works perfect for my X.400 captures.
But the multipart dissector is trying to decode as TNEF if the
"Remove base64 encoding from body" is turned off, which ob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Morriss wrote:
> Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is an update to the STUN2 dissector using the last draft,
>> draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-07.
>
> It doesn't compile as is:
>
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’ve fixed a bug in the Profinet-Dissector
> (plugins/profinet/packet-dcerpc-pn-io.c).
>
> In PROFINET IO DCE RPC write-requests, only the first IR frame dataset
> in PDIRFrameData was dissected.
>
> I’ve fixed the problem, now all IR frame datasets are diss
Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jeff Morriss wrote:
>> Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is an update to the STUN2 dissector using the last draft,
>>> draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I assume I should be fetching and calculating patches against
> the latest version via anonymous CVS rather than the latest
> 'released' version?
Patches against the top of the tree would probably be best.
___
Wireshark-dev ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/23/2007 01:22:17 PM:
> Fulko Hew wrote:
> > a)What is the proper procedure to get my code/support for my new DLT
type
> >incorporated into the official release of PCAP?
>
> Send a patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I assume I should be fetching and calculating patches
Fulko Hew wrote:
> a)What is the proper procedure to get my code/support for my new DLT type
>incorporated into the official release of PCAP?
Send a patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> b) See Note 1 for a second question.
>
> The changes amount to:
>
> 1/ gencode.c: Add a 'case DLT_SITA'.
> 2/ pca
a)What is the proper procedure to get my code/support for my new DLT type
incorporated into the official release of PCAP?
b) See Note 1 for a second question.
The changes amount to:
1/ gencode.c: Add a 'case DLT_SITA'.
2/ pcap-bpf.h: Add '#define DLT_SITA 196'.
3/ pcap.c: Add "DLT_CHOICE(DLT_S
Hi,
I've fixed a bug in the Profinet-Dissector
(plugins/profinet/packet-dcerpc-pn-io.c).
In PROFINET IO DCE RPC write-requests, only the first IR frame dataset
in PDIRFrameData was dissected.
I've fixed the problem, now all IR frame datasets are dissected into
individual sub-trees.
svn di
13 matches
Mail list logo
