Hi,
Committed in revision 22282.
Thanx,
Jaap
Victor Fajardo wrote:
> Hi Jaap,
>
> I found a small problem with the previous patch I've sent. I've attached
> a patch that fixes this issue; the patch is based on the latest rev I
> could get.
>
> regards,
> victor
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Committed in r
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 05:27:47PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> echo gnuTLS not found, disabling ssl decryption
>
> And this at the end:
>
> Use SSL crypto library : yes
> Use gnutls library : no
Understandable misunderstanding :-)
ssl decryption has nothing to d
On Jul 9, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> The current action taken by the configure script when the user
> specifies
> --with-ssl but gnutls is not found
This is confusing as hell.
First of all, "--with-ssl" really means "--with-ssl's--lcrypto-
library" - it doesn't cause us to lin
The current action taken by the configure script when the user specifies
--with-ssl but gnutls is not found is to print this message in the
middle of the configure checks:
checking for libgnutls-config... no
checking for libgnutls - version >= 1.0.0... no
*** The libgnutls-config script installed
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=22259
>>
>> User: jake
>> Date: 2007/07/06 08:34 PM
>>
>> Log:
>> Have the installer propose to install 4.0.1 over 4.0.0.
>>
>>
> I was already writing the mail to complain ;-)
>
Hi Jaap,
I found a small problem with the previous patch I've sent. I've attached
a patch that fixes this issue; the patch is based on the latest rev I
could get.
regards,
victor
Hi,
Committed in revision 22098.
Thanx,
Jaap
Victor Fajardo wrote:
Hi,
Attached is a patch based on rev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A new Windows installer (wireshark-setup-0.99.6a.exe) has been released
in order to fix a problem with updating from WinPcap 4.0 to 4.0.1.
There are no other changes in the installer. The source code and U3
packages have not changed. The file size an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This is an update to the STUN2 dissector using the last draft,
draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-07.
Here is the changelog:
* My employer is now sponsoring this work, so added a copyright line.
* Added a comment for each method/attribute with the RFC
Hi,
There is something wrong with the lua macro as the configure script
passes the lua test with "--with-lua=/usr/include" value but the
compilation will however fail.
I saw we could use pkg-config and at the first look, the macro is not
using it.
If I have the time this week, I'll check this on
Cruz, Petagay wrote:
> hi, how can I reduce the size of the wireshark library produced in 'make
> install'? I built without plugins. what is using all the space?
Well, for starters, all the dissectors - plugins *aren't* part of the
library, they're loaded at run time, but almost all the disss
Hello,
Thanks Jaap. I do not know how I missed sec 1.8 of README.developer.
Yash
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
hi, how can I reduce the size of the wireshark library produced in 'make
install'? I built without plugins. what is using all the space?
Maria Cruz
Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton
151 Industrial Way East
Eatontown, NJ 07724
732-935-5393
cruz_petagay mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @bah.com
_
Hi,
In the mean time let me remind everyone it is not allowed to simply drop
preferences from your code. Once it's in there it's in the preference
files and warnings like this appear if you do take it out.
The mechanism to solve this is by replacing your preference registration
by:
prefs_reg
i temporarily disabled sidsnooping for now.
sidsnooping was an idea i had a long time ago but i never finished properly.
it would be nice if it were enhanced in the future to actually look at
most of the dcerpc commands where sids are mapped and used it.
it would also be nice with a small gui wh
I'm seeing this error when starting wireshark (despite tshark below in
the error output).
Ronnie - will you be adding samr.hnd back again as a field, or should
this filter expression (in packet-smb-sidsnooping.c) be changed now?
tshark: Couldn't register
proto_reg_handoff_smb_sidsnooping()/samr_
15 matches
Mail list logo