Hi,
I can see your frustration. You like to be appreciated for the work done
on creating a feature/patch you want to share with the world. That is what
OSS is all about. On the other hand the "project owner' has to walk a
fine line, getting enough committers in, who don't get compensation, while
a
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:39:50AM +0100, Sake Blok wrote:
> Can't wait for the buildbot-build for my Windows laptop :) (I don't
> dare to make the move from linux-dev to windows-dev)
It's not that bad as long as you follow the directions :). Still, I'm a
Unix guy and only test changes done in
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:38:41AM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Sake Blok wrote:
> >
> > Could you take another look at it and submit it if it is OK now?
> >
> Yes, it's looking really good now - checked in as SVN 21005.
Great, thanks!
> In addition, I've added the en-/disabling to the other (a
Sake Blok wrote:
>
> I have changed the patch according to your suggestions and also changed
> the doc[book] files accordingly. I tested the patch and it does seem to
> work fine on my test-system.
>
> Could you take another look at it and submit it if it is OK now?
>
Yes, it's looking really go
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:36:00AM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
> I had a look at your patch and applied it to my personal tree, noting
> some things:
>
> 1) We already have a Copy submenu in both context menus, your function
> belongs into this (e.g. /Copy/As Filter) - right below
> Summary/De
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:54:00PM +0100, Sebastien Tandel wrote:
> the following should help :
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200703/msg00028.html
Indeed it did. Thanks!
(OK, I will check the archives a little more thorough in the future :))
Cheers,
Sake
Hi,
the following should help :
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200703/msg00028.html
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
Sake Blok wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone else have problems compiling Wireshark on FC4? Since
> revision 20951 I get the following errors:
>
> rm -f .libs/wiresharkS.c .
Hi All,
Does anyone else have problems compiling Wireshark on FC4? Since
revision 20951 I get the following errors:
rm -f .libs/wiresharkS.c .libs/wireshark.nm .libs/wireshark.nmS
.libs/wireshark.nmT
gcc -DINET6 "-D_U_=__attribute__((unused))" -Wall -Wpointer-arith -W -g -O2
-I/usr/local/includ
I've been using Google Talk and thought you might like to try it out.
We can use it to call each other for free over the internet. Here's an
invitation to download Google Talk. Give it a try!
---
Steven Le wants to stay in better
I am Saravanan working as a C programmer in India. Now Working in Socket
programming under LINUX.
I want to receive the raw packet with the header inormation
programatically using C. With that RAW PACKET I want to get the Destination
IP address stored in header.
I had searched the internet but
Hi to all,
I'm working on the H.223 dissector and I would like
to retrive the name of the called subdissectors over
the media streams payloads (AMR, H.263 ecc..) from within the
H.223 dissector.
Debugging the code I had the illusion of a solution looking
at pinfo->layer_names->str but unfortunatel
Douglas Pratley wrote:
> I submitted two patches earlier this year:
> ...
> Can anybody tell me their current status? That is:
To follow up what Doug has said, I have to say that I've found my recent
experiences in getting patches applied less than positive. Anders
applied quite a few, but ther
Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've re-read the previous discussion, it seems that this has been
> carefully studied. So I checked in the patch.
Thanks Jaap.
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/list
Anders Broman wrote:
> Of course
> Committed revision 20975.
> Best regards
> Anders
Thanks Anders!
Richard
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
John T. Haller wrote:
> If you mean the HostCleanup processes, be sure you're not doing anything
> critical within them as they are not guaranteed to run. Obviously, if
> the PC crashes, they never run (which most people know) but if you turn
> the PC off with the drive in, the U3 platform never s
Hi guys
I submitted two patches earlier this year:
31 January 2007 - User can select dissector based on packet matching
display filter
13 February 2007 - TShark input and output options
Can anybody tell me their current status? That is:
- Are they queued waiting for review?
- Are th
Dear WireShark Contributors,
I seek help from designers, developers, testers,defect fixers,project
managers or playing any other key role in Free/Open Source software
development or maintenence
in carrying out a study on practices and problems of defect management in
various Free/Open Source S
17 matches
Mail list logo
