Michael Zuffoletti wrote:
> I didn't have a problem installing the official 0.99.5 build with
> WinPcap 4 on NT4. I didn't notice any warning or install failure.
> However, this install as well as my own build of trunk rev 20835 with
> MSVC6 would not run. They gave the "PrintDlgExW could not be lo
I didn't have a problem installing the official 0.99.5 build with
WinPcap 4 on NT4. I didn't notice any warning or install failure.
However, this install as well as my own build of trunk rev 20835 with
MSVC6 would not run. They gave the "PrintDlgExW could not be located"
error.
I found that my GTK
It's heuristic, not having the setup of the association.
I mantain two tables.
pl_table conatinig a list of assocs indexed by "port_labels" a 32bit
label out of the ports being used (low_pt << 16 | high_pt)
and plvt_table indexed by port_label and verification_tag of one
direction which I assume
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Hi List!
>
> After a long time, I "felt" that it was time to drop support for Windows
> NT 4.0!
Is there a ** permanent ** link to a version that runs on NT4? I have a
requirement for one, but don't have the tools to build for NT.
Unless someone can come up with a set of fl
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 08:58:04AM -, Mark Lewis wrote:
> Here is the updated patch against the latest SVN. I've reattached the
> original capture as well in case you want to check the change.
Committed as SVN revision 20910. Thanks for your contribution!
Steve
__
Hi Lego,
I'm wondering how you tie together both directions of an SCTP
association?
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 23, 2007, at 8:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20908
>
> User: lego
> Date: 2007/02/23 08:57 PM
>
> Log:
> fix so
Hi List!
After a long time, I "felt" that it was time to drop support for Windows
NT 4.0!
The reasons for this step were:
- Microsoft itself dropped support for Windows NT 4.0 at the end of
2005, see
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/archive/winntas/ntendlife.mspx?mfr=true
- the libraries we
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20902
>
> User: lego
> Date: 2007/02/23 07:26 PM
>
> Log:
> Wow!
> hidden fields appear twice defeating the purpose, that's what I call
> deprecating a function!!
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissecto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20903
>
> User: jake
> Date: 2007/02/23 07:37 PM
>
> Log:
> Properly introduce packet-pn.c as a helper
>
>
Thanks, I just didn't know that!
Regards, ULFL
___
This patch add a test on the GTK version to avoid a warning with the
"gtk-label-select-on-focus" configuration parameter, introduced in
GTK-2.9.0.
(See attached file: simple_dialog.c.diff)
Regards
Florent
simple_dialog.c.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi,
Checked in.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Morro Roberto wrote:
> Dear Wireshark developers,
> Please find attached a patch to the RSVP dissector that fixes a small
> inaccuracy when printing the SENDER TSPEC object.
> Substantially, it changes the string
> "C-type: 1 - Integrated Service
Dear Wireshark developers,
Please find attached a patch to the RSVP dissector that fixes a small
inaccuracy when printing the SENDER TSPEC object.
Substantially, it changes the string
"C-type: 1 - Integrated Services" into the correct one
"C-type: 2 - Integrated Services"
<>
The patch file was c
Hi Steve,
Here is the updated patch against the latest SVN. I've reattached the
original capture as well in case you want to check the change.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher
Sent: 22 February 2007 07:18
To:
13 matches
Mail list logo
