Re: [Wireshark-dev] Slow startup delay caused by uninitialized variable...

2007-01-10 Thread Kovarththanan Rajaratnam
Hello Gerald Combs wrote: > Can you try one of the recent installers from > > http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/win32/ > > and see if the problem still exists? I updated the GNUTLS package in > the installer recently, which hopefully fixes the problem. With 0.99.4 I experienced st

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20385: /trunk/ /trunk/packaging/nsis/: wireshark.nsi /trunk/: Makefile.am

2007-01-10 Thread Luis Ontanon
On 1/11/07, Ulf Lamping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luis Ontanon wrote: > > We could migrate the EXTRA_DIST macro from trunk/Makefile.am to > > trunk/Makefile.common and use it to generate the distribution files > > for windows too. > > > > Generating an extra_dist.ini file for nsi if in fact it d

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20385: /trunk/ /trunk/packaging/nsis/: wireshark.nsi /trunk/: Makefile.am

2007-01-10 Thread Ulf Lamping
Luis Ontanon wrote: > We could migrate the EXTRA_DIST macro from trunk/Makefile.am to > trunk/Makefile.common and use it to generate the distribution files > for windows too. > > Generating an extra_dist.ini file for nsi if in fact it does support > including files? > Hmmm, not sure if I underst

[Wireshark-dev] Changes to the BER dissector

2007-01-10 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Can some one have a look at the changes in packet BER and See if they make sense or if a different solution should be sought? BR Anders ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-de

[Wireshark-dev] Is pcap-ng/ntar still in roadmap?

2007-01-10 Thread Benn Bollay
Hello all - Is the next-gen pcap format still in the roadmap at all? I've heard nothing about it for ages; there doesn't seem to be any discussions, nor any implemention details for well over a year now. I'm trying to decide whether I should hack-up the libpcap format or spend more development e

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20385: /trunk/ /trunk/packaging/nsis/: wireshark.nsi /trunk/: Makefile.am

2007-01-10 Thread Luis Ontanon
We could migrate the EXTRA_DIST macro from trunk/Makefile.am to trunk/Makefile.common and use it to generate the distribution files for windows too. Generating an extra_dist.ini file for nsi if in fact it does support including files? On 1/10/07, Ulf Lamping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PR

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20385: /trunk/ /trunk/packaging/nsis/: wireshark.nsi /trunk/: Makefile.am

2007-01-10 Thread Ulf Lamping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20385 > > User: lego > Date: 2007/01/10 09:48 PM > > Log: > Add the example_snmp_users_file to the ditribution > > Directory: /trunk/packaging/nsis/ > ChangesPath Action > +1 -0 wir

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Microsoft Visual C Version 6support isa bitoutdated ...

2007-01-10 Thread Ulf Lamping
Anders Broman (AL/EAB) wrote: > Hi, > Thanks Ulf it works fine. > > When doing packaging I get: > 1 warning: > File: "C:\wireshark-win32-libs\zlib123-dll\zlib1.dll.manifest" -> no files > fou > nd. (wireshark.nsi:315) > > Should be fixed now, I simply messed up the line copying the file "

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Add U3 package to the release process?

2007-01-10 Thread Ulf Lamping
Gerald Combs wrote: > I just modified the U3 package build to add the version number to the > package file name. (Hopefully this doesn't break anything Graeme is doing). > > Is there any reason the Windows U3 package shouldn't be added as one of > the official release packages (and to Buildbot)? >

[Wireshark-dev] Add U3 package to the release process?

2007-01-10 Thread Gerald Combs
I just modified the U3 package build to add the version number to the package file name. (Hopefully this doesn't break anything Graeme is doing). Is there any reason the Windows U3 package shouldn't be added as one of the official release packages (and to Buildbot)? __

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Microsoft Visual C Version 6support isa bitoutdated ...

2007-01-10 Thread Anders Broman \(AL/EAB\)
Hi, Thanks Ulf it works fine. When doing packaging I get: 1 warning: File: "C:\wireshark-win32-libs\zlib123-dll\zlib1.dll.manifest" -> no files fou nd. (wireshark.nsi:315) BR Anders Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] genom Ulf Lamping Skickat: on 2007-01-10 01:38 Till:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] roofnet v1

2007-01-10 Thread Nicola Arnoldi
Was the pcap file enough? Bye Nicola Il giorno mar, 09/01/2007 alle 12.34 +0100, Sebastien Tandel ha scritto: > Hi, > >Can you send a pcap file for testing purpose, please? > > > Regards, > > Sebastien Tandel > > Nicola Arnoldi wrote: > > Hi everybody. > > The great work Sebastien did a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector plugin not registering properly.

2007-01-10 Thread Anders Broman \(AL/EAB\)
Hi, Hard to tell without seeing the register routine. Are you sure there is a valid handle when you do the dissector_add()? BR Anders Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] genom Jared King Skickat: on 2007-01-10 07:04 Till: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Ämne: [Wireshark-dev] Dis

[Wireshark-dev] Dissector plugin not registering properly.

2007-01-10 Thread Jared King
I am writing a dissector plugin for an inhouse message protocol. I can not get it to dissect the packets it should. Wireshark sees the plugin, it brings up the preference I have created to set the port number manually. Initially I use a line like: "dissector_add("tcp.port", , my_protocol_handl

Re: [Wireshark-dev] SNMPv3 USM crypto support

2007-01-10 Thread LEGO
On 1/10/07, Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:15:55PM +0100, Thomas Anders wrote: > > Plenty, but I'm not sure they're related: > > packet-snmp-template.c: In function 'snmp_usm_priv_des': > > packet-snmp-template.c:1169: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark/Ethereal compatibility

2007-01-10 Thread Andrew.Martin
I understand that there is no guaranteed compatibility. It doesn't really matter now anyway, I tried versions 13 and 14 too and neither worked, so I'll stick with "it's a dissector for wireshark." Cheers -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gu

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Microsoft Visual C Version 6support isa bitoutdated ...

2007-01-10 Thread Graham Bloice
Alfred Alinazar wrote: > Ulf Lamping wrote: >> Hi Alfred! >> >> That's unrelated to the MSVC things. >> >> This seems to be a problem with your bison version (and I really don't >> have a lot of knowledge about bison). >> >> The only thing I know is that the cygwin bison version (2.3) works well

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark/Ethereal compatibility

2007-01-10 Thread Guy Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've developed a dissector using Wireshark 0.99.4, and it works fine. > Now during development I'm sure I checked if the dissector worked on > ethereal, and again, I'm sure it did. However I didn't check the version > number. > > One of the people now testing the di

[Wireshark-dev] Wireshark/Ethereal compatibility

2007-01-10 Thread Andrew.Martin
Hi guys, I've developed a dissector using Wireshark 0.99.4, and it works fine. Now during development I'm sure I checked if the dissector worked on ethereal, and again, I'm sure it did. However I didn't check the version number. One of the people now testing the dissector has just told me that

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Microsoft Visual C Version 6support isa bitoutdated ...

2007-01-10 Thread Alfred Alinazar
Ulf Lamping wrote: > Hi Alfred! > > That's unrelated to the MSVC things. > > This seems to be a problem with your bison version (and I really don't > have a lot of knowledge about bison). > > The only thing I know is that the cygwin bison version (2.3) works well > on my machines while you seem t

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Microsoft Visual C Version 6support isa bitoutdated ...

2007-01-10 Thread Ulf Lamping
Andrew Hood wrote: > Then it falls over because htmlhelp.lib is not in $(HHC_DIR)/lib. I said > before VS8 includes hhc.exe in $(HHC_DIR) but the includes, libs and > dlls are in the SDK, so I changed the HHC_LIBS in config.nmake > > !IF "$(MSVC_VARIANT)" == "MSVC2005" > HHC_LIBS=htmlhelp.lib > !EL

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20373: /trunk/ /trunk/doc/: README.developer /trunk/epan/: Makefile.common libwireshark.def packet.c packet.h proto.c tfs.c tfs.h

2007-01-10 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Anything specific you are refering to? I kept bumping into the practice of coding the same true_false_string over and over again in the plugins I'm supporting. Thinking that could be done smarter I found the start of a true_false_string collection in packet.c and extended from that. Thanx, Ja

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20354: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: load_snmp_users_file.l

2007-01-10 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:41:15PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20354 > > User: lego > Date: 2007/01/09 06:41 PM > > Log: > SNMPv3 USM... the forgotten file :) > > Directory: /trunk/epan/ > ChangesPath

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20373: /trunk/ /trunk/doc/: README.developer /trunk/epan/: Makefile.common libwireshark.def packet.c packet.h proto.c tfs.c tfs.h

2007-01-10 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 07:47:00AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Log: > Extending true_false_string support > - Separate tfs.[ch] > - Add larger sample collection > - Properly export DATA Does this really make sense? ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer

Re: [Wireshark-dev] SNMPv3 USM crypto support

2007-01-10 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:15:55PM +0100, Thomas Anders wrote: > Plenty, but I'm not sure they're related: > packet-snmp-template.c: In function 'snmp_usm_priv_des': > packet-snmp-template.c:1169: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and > code At least this warning will break compilation

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Microsoft Visual C Version 6support isa bitoutdated ...

2007-01-10 Thread Ulf Lamping
Alfred Alinazar wrote: > Ulf Lamping wrote: > >>> I have MSVC 8.0 build 50727. I detest trying to use the M$ compiler >>> suite, but sometimes the alternatives are worse. >>> >>> >> Do you use the Express Edition or the Studio? >> > Ulf, > > I'm using MSVC 2005 Express edition.