Ian wrote:
> I'm a Wireshark user and not a member of this list, so apologies if
> posting as a non-member is inappropriate. I will subscribe to the list
> if needs be.
>
> I have a problem capturing on Windows XP. I'm running Wireshark 0.99.4
> installed using the Windows Installer package from
I'm a Wireshark user and not a member of this list, so apologies if posting
as a non-member is inappropriate. I will subscribe to the list if needs be.
I have a problem capturing on Windows XP. I'm running Wireshark
0.99.4installed using the Windows Installer package from
wireshark.org.
I'm usin
Hi,
I have checked in the asn2wrs generated ANSI MAP dissector. Could people
with ANSI MAP traces
please have a go at it to help fix any remaining bugs and/or add missing
features/dissection.
BR
Anders
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wiresha
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 11:21:37PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20318
>
> User: gerald
> Date: 2007/01/04 11:21 PM
>
> Log:
> Don't lower-case our SSID and passphrase, otherwise we'll create an
> incorrect PSK hash.
The code
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Andrew Hood wrote:
>
>>http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.users/browse_thread/thread/72c89ea76c253905/76f8cbdc64a6efd6?lnk=st&q=MSVC+%22X509_NAME%22&rnum=1#76f8cbdc64a6efd6
>>
>>and
>>
>>http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.users/browse_thread/thread/e01d
Hi,
Implement the change, but make the current line a hidden item, so the
filter expressions remain valid. I know we shouldn't make hidden items
since people won't know that they can filter on them, but that is just the
point here! It provides a smooth transistion.
Oh, and the "Time delta from pr
What about
Time since reference or first frame: 0.0 seconds
^
versus
Time delta from previous packet: 0.0 seconds
^^
Just wondering...
Best regards
Michael
On Jan 6, 2007, at 4:08 AM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>
> Can
Of course, it would be necessary to merge those records during desegmentation
process is subdissector requires it. Then HTTP shouls work. My proposal is not
to do it automatically without request from subdissector.
I will look into the code again on Monady.
BTW I affraid SSL dissector will
Stephen Fisher wrote:
> Can we get a consensus on whether or not to make the change suggested in
> bug #813 so we can close it out? :) I'm leaning toward making the
> change, but that would mean also changing the display filter that people
> are used to.
His only complaint appears to be that i
