[Wireshark-dev] Problems encountered on Windows building from a "source tarball"

2006-12-26 Thread Bill Meier
While testing building Wireshark on Windows from a 'source tarball' (from today) I encountered the following problems: 1. The airpdcap directory is accessed as part of the make (even if AIRPCAP_DIR is not defined in config.nmake) but is not in the source tarball; 2. .../plugins/mate/moduleinfo.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ptvcursor : one step further?

2006-12-26 Thread Guy Harris
Sebastien Tandel wrote: > What is done hereabove when playing with subtrees is like acting as > push/pop actions => then add this feature in the ptvcursor API. It can > be done in the following way : > - add a field in the ptvcursor structure which retains the push/pop of > subtrees (fixed-length

[Wireshark-dev] Win32 config.nmake: Python default configuration changed from cygwin to Win32 native python implementation!!!

2006-12-26 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi List! Recently, there were repeating problems with the python implementation shipped with cygwin. Even after spending some annoying time in an attempt to fix this, there wasn't a solution to this problem. To fix this, I've changed the default settings in config.nmake to use the native pyth

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20221: /trunk/ /trunk/: Makefile.nmake config.nmake

2006-12-26 Thread Ulf Lamping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Log: > Uh Oh: Fix to properly set SH_FLAGS with 'igncr' if required as part of the > nmake; > I violated Murphy's nth law: thou shalt test fixes in an > 'out of the box' configuration *not* in one's customized configuration. > :( > Sounds like a "good trick (tm)"

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] ctype functions review

2006-12-26 Thread Guy Harris
Sebastien Tandel wrote: >patch which changes input parameter type of a ctype function from > (g)char to guchar avoiding undefined results. Checked in. ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listin

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Temp filename for capturing starts with "ether"

2006-12-26 Thread Jeff Morriss
Stephen Fisher wrote: > Is the temporary filename for capturing that starts with "ether" a relic > from the Ethereal project name? [I noticed this again today and remembered your post from a while back...] Undoubtedly. But the name of this temporary capture is everywhere: in the FAQ, the Wik

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why is the Win32 buildbot running with the current configuration settings?!? Is it still using old cygwin versions?

2006-12-26 Thread Gerald Combs
Ulf Lamping wrote: > Gerald Combs wrote: >> The Windows builder has the native Python (2.4.4) installed. It's a >> prerequisite for Buildbot. >> > Thanks for the info! > > Some remaining questions about the buildbot: > > Does the buildbot currently use the config.nmake from SVN (with cygwins

Re: [Wireshark-dev] build problem

2006-12-26 Thread Prokash Sinha
No. I was not able to. This is the first time I'm trying to build out of source. I installed the cygwin environment, and the develp env that are required. The problem I see is that the dir. sturct. layout that comes from cygwin is not what this package is expecting. Under both cygwin or windows

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why is the Win32 buildbot running with the current configuration settings?!? Is it still using old cygwin versions?

2006-12-26 Thread Ulf Lamping
Gerald Combs wrote: > The Windows builder has the native Python (2.4.4) installed. It's a > prerequisite for Buildbot. > Thanks for the info! Some remaining questions about the buildbot: Does the buildbot currently use the config.nmake from SVN (with cygwins python) or does it use a customiz

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why is the Win32 buildbot running with the current configuration settings?!? Is it still using old cygwin versions?

2006-12-26 Thread Gerald Combs
Ulf Lamping wrote: > I'll change the configuration accordingly soon. I'll guess the buildbot > will fail from that moment until Gerald installs the Win32 python :-( The Windows builder has the native Python (2.4.4) installed. It's a prerequisite for Buildbot.

[Wireshark-dev] EtherCAT plugin?

2006-12-26 Thread Stephen Glow
There was discussion on the list several months ago about an EtherCAT plugin for wireshark. Has anyone done work on this? I'd love to have a copy of the source as it stands right now, even if it's not 100% ready for prime time. Thanks, Steve ___ Wir

Re: [Wireshark-dev] build problem

2006-12-26 Thread Ulf Lamping
Prokash Sinha wrote: > I tried that too. > > What I was expecting is that if I follow the Developers doc, I should > pretty much be able to build it, without much reconfigurations. Unfortunately there were some fundamental changes in the cygwin tools that are not updated in the Devel Guide. >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why is the Win32 buildbot running with the current configuration settings?!? Is it still using old cygwin versions?

2006-12-26 Thread Ulf Lamping
Jaap Keuter wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be a good idea to branch off into all kinds of native windows > tools? I know cygwin can be a pain, but it puts all in one place, limiting > version hell. > > Yes, this is also my point of view. But the first goal in this regard is to have a default config

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Cygwin Bash update breaks verify_tools

2006-12-26 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! The current solution with the SH_FLAGS magic doesn't seem to work on my machine - and the build problems of Prokash Sinha indicates that I'm not alone with this. I'm using the latest cygwin bash that provides the igncr option - but the SH_FLAGS is empty when used in Makefile.nmake. I've c

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why is the Win32 buildbot running with the current configuration settings?!? Is it still using old cygwin versions?

2006-12-26 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Would it be a good idea to branch off into all kinds of native windows tools? I know cygwin can be a pain, but it puts all in one place, limiting version hell. Just my $0.02 Jaap On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Ulf Lamping wrote: > Hi List! > > The current default settings (config.nmake / Makefile.nma

[Wireshark-dev] Why is the Win32 buildbot running with the current configuration settings?!? Is it still using old cygwin versions?

2006-12-26 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi List! The current default settings (config.nmake / Makefile.nmake) don't run on my machine without changes - and I don't seem to be the only one (see prokashs problems lately). I'm wondering why the buildbot is running without problems - I guess it's still using old cygwin tools. These are

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Patch] : IPsec

2006-12-26 Thread frederic . roudaut
Hi, At least I may try, but unfortunatly not before next year ;-( Regards, --- Frederic Roudaut Selon Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Large patch, unfortunately it's mixed whitespace and code change. > Could you split these out, making them easier to review? > > Thanx, > Jaap > >

[Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] ctype functions review

2006-12-26 Thread Sebastien Tandel
Hi all, patch which changes input parameter type of a ctype function from (g)char to guchar avoiding undefined results. Regards, Sebastien Tandel Index: epan/dissectors/packet-sip.c === --- epan/dissectors/packet-sip.c(

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] ISIS Checksum

2006-12-26 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Checked in. Thanx, Jaap On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Sebastien Tandel wrote: > Hi all, > >Here is a patch for the management of the bad/good checksum for ISIS > (like TCP/UDP/IP). > support added for : > - booleans hf_isis_lsp_checksum_good, hf_isis_lsp_checksum_bad in the tree, > - information

Re: [Wireshark-dev] build problem

2006-12-26 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Did you already build the setup target? Thanx, Jaap On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Prokash Sinha wrote: > I tried that too. > > What I was expecting is that if I follow the Developers doc, I should pretty > much be able to build it, without much reconfigurations. > > I installed the cygwin, and all r