Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Gerald Combs wrote:
>> No complaints here. Are there any issues with the supporting libraries
>> that need to be addressed, e.g. msvcrt.dll vs msvcr7.dll?
>>
> Do you mean legal issues, or something else?
I mean having Wireshark linked against a newer CRT DLL and glib link
Gerald Combs wrote:
> No complaints here. Are there any issues with the supporting libraries
> that need to be addressed, e.g. msvcrt.dll vs msvcr7.dll?
>
Do you mean legal issues, or something else?
Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wires
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Hi List!
>
> We currently only "support" MSVC Version 6 for the Windows builds.
>
> As Version 6 is pretty much outdated and it's possible that I won't have
> access to such an installation in the near future, it seems to become
> time to make WS buildable on a newer MSVC v
Hi List!
We currently only "support" MSVC Version 6 for the Windows builds.
As Version 6 is pretty much outdated and it's possible that I won't have
access to such an installation in the near future, it seems to become
time to make WS buildable on a newer MSVC version.
If available time permit
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:07:39AM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Accordingly, I've changed the defaults "Update list of packets in
> realtime" and "Auto scroll" to TRUE and the "show summary window" to
> FALSE.
Good catch, thanks!
Steve
___
Wireshark
Hi List!
To my surprise, after installing WS on a new machine, I've realized that
the default capturing options are still to show the capture summary
window while a capture is in progress. Unfortunately, this hides a very
helpful feature to new users - unless he/she figures out that this
featu
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 04:06:15AM +0100, Sebastien Tandel wrote:
>a little patch against revision 20088 in packet-isis-lsp.c for the
> following :
> - hf_isis_lsp_remaining_life declared but unused
> - replacing a proto_tree_add_uint useless with proto_tree_add_item
Your patch has been check
Hi,
In addittion look at the funktion dissect_gsm_map_ISDN_AddressString() ip
packet-gsm_map.c
and
item = get_ber_last_created_item();
subtree = proto_item_add_subtree(item, ett_gsm_map_isdn_address_string);
proto_tree_add_item(subtree, hf_gsm_map_extension, parameter_tvb, 0,1,FALSE);
proto_
Hi,
The value used to mach the value string value is the "masked out" value.
So if the value is 0xc0f0 and the mask is 0xc00 the value used to match the
string would be 3.
BR
Anders
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] genom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: må 2006-12-18 08:09
Ti
Hi Anders/ Steve ,
This is with regards to the mail posted by vikash "How to dissect bit
information".
As you have suggested we can get the desired bit/bits by masking the
remaining bits.But the problem we are facing
is there is a set of values assosiated with each bit / bits.In
Wireshark, t
Thanks for the feedback.
> Having two Copy menu items in the details context menu might
> be too much, however, "remixing" the copy menu items will be
> easy once the functionality is settled, so the menu structure
> shouldn't be a problem.
Yep; I'll just get something working and see how it
11 matches
Mail list logo