Hi,
And note that Wireshark can't be built "without the other tools"
on any system.
BR
Anders
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Jaap Keuter
Skickat: den 30 november 2006 22:16
Till: Developer support list for Wireshark
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev
Hi,
Just faithfully follow the developer guides guidelines on setting up your
development environment, including cygwin and its tools, as well gathering
the libraries.
Tried it a couple of times, never failed on me.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Sleep Less wrote:
> Hi All,
> from Andre Ma
You can always use proto_tree_add_text to add plain text to the dissection tree.
But I can tell you from experience that although you may not want to
filter on those fields now... in the future you might want to, and
another person might need them, too.
--gilbert
On 11/30/06, Eliot Blennerhasset
I have made a start on writing dissector plugins for a couple of protocols
My question is whether it is possible to add an item to the protocol tree
without registering it.
Standard code for an item looks something like this
/**/
static int
Hi All,
from Andre Martin's recent (Nov 2) posting it is not clear to me if Wireshark
can be indeed compiled under MSVC 6.0 in a hassle free manner?
The developers doc is really partial, e.g on page 24 section 2.6.2 the nmake
example
seems to give an example of a failure, not of the correct
Maybe the problems lies here (capture_opts.c) :
static gboolean capture_opts_output_to_pipe(const char *save_file, gboolean
*is_pipe)
{
int err;
if (save_file != NULL) {
/* We're writing to a capture file. */
if (strcmp(save_file, "-") == 0) {
/* Writing to stdout. */
/*
Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> If you supply a patch please, please attach it as a file to the email
> instead of pasting it in the text. Makes handling it nearly impossible,
> like in this case.
It depends on the tools you use. In some circles (e.g. LKML) the preferred way
to do it
