Symbol sends 173 (0xad). Does anyone have a decode for the content of these
elements?
-Bob
Bob O'Hara
Black Storm Networks
250 Cambridge Avenue
Suite 200
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Phone: +1 650 617 2935
Mobile: +1 408 218 4025
Fax:+1 810 277 4718
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
general wir
Ravi,
Anyone is able to participate in the work of the 802.11 Working Group by
submitting papers. However, to become a member, i.e., one who is able
to vote on the technical work of 802.11 and influence the outcome of the
standards development process, one must physically attend the meetings
or
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bob O'Hara
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Ravi Prakash B.V.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [BAWUG] How to become member in the IEEE 802.11 working
group?
Ravi,
Anyone is able to participate in the work of the 802.11 Working Group by
submitt
Vinod,
The 802.11 standard specifies some basic requirements for multi-rate
transmission, in order to maintain interoperability between various
implementations. However, the actual algorithms used to select the
transmit rate for a particular frame to a particular destination is
entirely vendor s
Nathan,
The Spectralink Link WTS uses a proprietary MAC and radio, operating in
the 902-928 MHz band. Their Netlink product uses 802.11b with their
proprietary SVP QoS mechanism, which, contrary to their claims, is not
compliant with the 802.11 standard. See
http://www.spectralink.com/products/s
16 kbytes/sec
1000 kus8 kbytes/sec (can anyone say 56k modem ;^)
I hope this has been helpful.
-Bob
Bob O'Hara
Black Storm Networks
110 Nortech Parkway
San Jose, CA 95134-2307
Phone: +1 408 941 0500
Mobile: +1 408 218 4025
Fax:+1 810 277 4718
email: [EMAIL PROT
to a Sponsor ballot. No draft of the work of TGi has
yet been approved by a Working Group ballot.
-Bob O'Hara
-Original Message-
From: Brian Mansfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BAWUG] TGi Draft 3.0 Go
Pot...kettle...black
-Bob
-Original Message-
From: Greg Herlein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Schmidt, Kevin
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [BAWUG] 126 Networks Found - Not Really Trying
> I like the term wardriving! Stuck the big wardriver
One other possibility is that the receiver is near to a very high
powered AP and there is enough energy in the signal to recover it far
from its transmitted channel. This can be easily demonstrated with a
Cisco 1200 AP, transmitting at full power (100mW) on channel 6. Within
about 20 feet, the Be
, October 14, 2003 5:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bob O'Hara
Subject: Re: [BAWUG] beacon frames and channels
> Beacons contain the channel ID in the beacon frame.
right: in the DS Parameter Set. Thanks for
Simon's point is a good one. The European regulatory requirements are
addressed in 802.11h, a new amendment to the 802.11 standard published
earlier this month.
With the WRC'03 results on the future of the 5 GHz band, this
requirement will be likely to spread to other areas, as well. The US
na
Vinod,
There is nothing in 802.11 that coordinates the channel assignment of
APs. So by necessity, anything that does so is proprietary. However,
there is new work being investigated in the IETF, called CAPWAP (control
and provisioning of wireless access points) that would address this
issue. T
Actually, the answer is yes, you can support dynamic WEP keys without an
EAP authentication method. The way to do this is with a pre-shared key.
This requires entering a key or pass phrase on both the client and AP,
and enabling WPA-PSK as the security method. The AP and client then use
the EAPOL
Prasanth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:20 PM
To: Bob O'Hara
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [BAWUG] Dynamic WEP Keys
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the answer.
I have another query.
If the station & AP are both configured for WPA-PSK,
can we do authentication?
licant & Authenticator side
rigth??
Please clarify me, Thanks in advance.
regards
-krishna
--- "Nelson, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob O'Hara writes...
>
> > Actually, the answer is yes, you can support
> dynamic WEP keys without
> an
&
Simon is quite correct. Any AP that attempts to present multiple SSIDs
without each SSID having a unique BSSID is VERY likely to not be
compatible with the majority of client cards that are out there.
One thing that Simon is not quite correct about is that you have to wait
for next year to get "t
I agree with Simon that a single AP with multiple BSSIDs/SSIDs should
not cause any QoS problems. Rather the contrary, as Simon points out.
It is much easier to coordinate QoS in a single AP than in several,
independent APs. The clients contribute the same amount of trouble for
QoS in both cases.
up to other task groups to include in their standards
what will go into the context block.
-Bob O'Hara (technical editor of 802.11F)
BTW, Happy New Year, Bill!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Arbaugh
Sent: Thursday, Janua
Address 4 is only used for "wireless distribution systems", where the
Ethernet on the AP is replaced by an 802.11 link to another device.
-Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Timolthy Keithy
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 3:24 AM
T
Title: Message
The
effective throughput for the 11g user will drop, because the 11g standard
requires the use of a "protection mechanism" whenever an 11b client is
associated at the AP or at an overlapping AP that is on the same channel.
The reason that a protection mechanism is required is
20 matches
Mail list logo
