https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #124 from Jaskie ---
(In reply to Cy Schubert from comment #123)
Tested. WiFi didn't work. /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant -dd -i wlan1 -c
/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf.open -D bsd 2>&1 | tee output.file output (~3min)
uploaded.
--
You a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #125 from Jaskie ---
Created attachment 234857
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=234857&action=edit
output from wap 2.10 patched (2 patches)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
Glen Barber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|g...@freebsd.org,|r...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #127 from Cy Schubert ---
(In reply to Jaskie from comment #125)
Thank you. A different error message to work on now. (Sadly, not being able to
reproduce this problem here is a disadvantage.)
Hypothesis: I suspect the problem
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #128 from Cy Schubert ---
Can everyone here please confirm security/wpa_supplicant also does not work.
The port has disabled P2P support by default while base has it enabled.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #129 from Adrian Chadd ---
heh, we shouldn't have p2p enabled until we have support for it. :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #130 from Cy Schubert ---
Yeah, it's not the issue anyway. Read my next post.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #131 from Cy Schubert ---
Hi Jackie,
Reviewing one of your previous outputs (wpa_out_p1) we see:
wlan0: Automatic auth_alg selection: 0x1
No supported operating classes IE to add
wlan0: Trying to associate with 70:d9:31:0e:2c:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #132 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3e8eb5c7f4909209c042403ddee340b2ee7003a5
commit 3e8eb5c7f4909209c042403ddee340b2ee7003a5
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #133 from Adrian Chadd ---
hm, so if the WPA IEs are /actually/ making it into the TXed frames and it's
not a net80211 / driver bug somehow ew.
Yes, it's common to have open + WPA VAPs. Heck, I do it at home sometimes for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #134 from Cy Schubert ---
Yes, but should it add those frames to the open VAP too?
Can you check your equipment for the same "feature?"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #135 from Adrian Chadd ---
a) it doesn't on a tplink
b) it should not, no
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #136 from Adrian Chadd ---
oh crazy q - are the VAP MAC addresses different? Between the WPA and open
VAPs?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #137 from Cy Schubert ---
WRT one of my Netgear APs, no, they do not share the same MAC. However the 2.4
GHz and 5 GHz secondary VAPs share the same channel as their primary VAPs.
Makes sense as the device has two radios.
The o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264238
--- Comment #138 from Jaskie ---
(In reply to Cy Schubert from comment #131)
I don't understand the tech stuff and code behind this. But I can confirm that
there is only one WiFi hosted. We have different WiFi setup at different
workplace
15 matches
Mail list logo
