On 4/30/12 6:24 AM, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
Eric Pouech wrote:
Le 29/04/2012 22:44, Eric Pouech a écrit :
for the devels having upgraded their boxes to ubuntu 12.04, here's a
couple of stuff I had to do, especially to get 32bit wine compile
This could be useful if you want to have a dual x
On 4/30/12 2:17 AM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
On 04/29/2012 10:44 PM, Eric Pouech wrote:
for the devels having upgraded their boxes to ubuntu 12.04, here's a
couple of stuff I had to do, especially to get 32bit wine compile
That's funny because I just tried yesterday and filed [1] to see what
dev
On 4/30/12 1:37 AM, Eric Pouech wrote:
This is because you _cannot_ install the 32-bit -dev packages onto
12.04. It's not just symlinks that are missing, many of the header
files are different between the arches.
I'm not sure this is a generic rule, and if it were, then exclusion
between i386 a
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18137
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18138
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18134
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18133
Your paranoid android
What's wrong with these patches :
- http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/85862
- http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/85862
There are marked as pending but can't see anything wrong. Maybe I'm
missing something.
Christian
The patches look good to me.
Am Sonntag, 29. April 2012, 21:43:08 schrieb Józef Kucia:
> This patch series implements the DDS support for D3DXGetImageInfo functions.
>
> Try 2: Define pitch as LONG.
> Try 3: Revert it back to DWORD.
> ---
> dlls/d3dx9_36/surface.c | 66
> ++
Am Montag, 30. April 2012, 15:26:30 schrieb Thomas Faber:
> port sounds great - but (assuming there shouldn't be any "0x7fc0" or
> "#ifdef _MSC_VER" in the solution) the best I can come up with at the moment
> is the following :|
Alexandre prefers checks in configure that set macros like HAVE_I
On 2012-04-29 12:05, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Samstag, 28. April 2012, 10:16:13 schrieb Thomas Faber:
>> Apparently NAN and INFINITE are C99 as well (I should really get a
>> version of the old standard instead of mostly reading C99 :|).
>>
>> How about a simple const variable that will trick M
Eric Pouech wrote:
> Le 29/04/2012 22:44, Eric Pouech a écrit :
>> for the devels having upgraded their boxes to ubuntu 12.04, here's a
>> couple of stuff I had to do, especially to get 32bit wine compile
>> This could be useful if you want to have a dual x86_64 : i386 setup
>>
>> this is an update
On 04/29/2012 10:44 PM, Eric Pouech wrote:
Warning at compilation
--
when compiling, some warnings still have to be worked upon
/home/eric/work/wine/dlls/winex11.drv/keyboard.c:1109:5: warning:
'XKeycodeToKeysym' is deprecated (declared at
/usr/include/X11/Xlib.h:1695) [-Wde
On 04/29/2012 10:44 PM, Eric Pouech wrote:
for the devels having upgraded their boxes to ubuntu 12.04, here's a
couple of stuff I had to do, especially to get 32bit wine compile
That's funny because I just tried yesterday and filed [1] to see what
developers think.
They are aware of the issue b
Huw Davies wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > ---
> > dlls/gdi32/freetype.c |6 ++
> > dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c | 17 -
> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> This will break the display of bitmap fonts in
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> ---
> dlls/gdi32/freetype.c |6 ++
> dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c | 17 -
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
This will break the display of bitmap fonts in winex11.drv .
Do you have an app
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Eric Pouech wrote:
>> This is because you _cannot_ install the 32-bit -dev packages onto
>> 12.04. It's not just symlinks that are missing, many of the header
>> files are different between the arches.
> I'm not sure this is a generic rule, and if it were, then e
> This is because you _cannot_ install the 32-bit -dev packages onto
> 12.04. It's not just symlinks that are missing, many of the header
> files are different between the arches.
I'm not sure this is a generic rule, and if it were, then exclusion
between i386 and x86_64 should be defined on most
18 matches
Mail list logo
