On 05/01/15 23:27, HJ Mitchell wrote:
> Competing with Wikipedia (replying to Fabian; sorry for breaking the
> threading) always struck me as being a bit like arguing with yourself.
> Wikipedia is far from flawless (as a concept, as a project, or as an
> encyclopaedia), but the whole point of it is
There are sites that can successfully co-exist with Wikipedia, either by
focusing on a niche area that is out of scope for Wikipedia (almost
everything at Wikia for example), or by having a different philosophy
(e.g. Rational Wiki), or some combination of the two (e.g. TV Tropes). Not
all are s
Happy New Year everyone,
I hope Santa was generous and has given you enough reference materials for
the foreseeable future, but if anyone is interested, we have the following
free books available for experienced Wikipedians who could make use of them
in your editing.
*Greek and Roman Political Id
