On 25/09/12 16:57, HJ Mitchell wrote:
If the policy is inadequate, it should be modified, but until it is,
it should be applied to every case.
From: http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Finance_Policy_2012 .
"All claims for reimbursement will be paid, unless disputed, by BACS or
through petty
Old users may still call their system BACS. (Cambridge University still
does; I know they're not representative though.)
On Sep 27, 2012 8:00 AM, "Gordon Joly" wrote:
> On 25/09/12 16:57, HJ Mitchell wrote:
>
>
> If the policy is inadequate, it should be modified, but until it is, it
> should b
Olde users may request postal orders by telegram.
On 27 September 2012 10:49, Deryck Chan wrote:
> Old users may still call their system BACS. (Cambridge University still
> does; I know they're not representative though.)
> On Sep 27, 2012 8:00 AM, "Gordon Joly" wrote:
>
>> On 25/09/12 16:57,
On 27 September 2012 08:00, Gordon Joly wrote:
> BACS was replaced by Faster Payments in January 2012.
Generic wording such as "electronic transfer" would be (relatively)
future-proof.
Per [[WP:CRYSTAL]] ;-)
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
_
Or simply "bank transfer". Not sure if we worry about tele-banking or banks
being replaced first.
On Sep 27, 2012 11:22 AM, "Andy Mabbett" wrote:
> On 27 September 2012 08:00, Gordon Joly wrote:
>
> > BACS was replaced by Faster Payments in January 2012.
>
> Generic wording such as "electronic t
I have had two email conversations this morning about hot and often
perennial issues around editing, ethics etc. It strikes me that there is
an appetite for having some osrt of debates, perhaps streamed, where people
came together to debate hot issues,
Any thoughts.
--
*Jon Davies - Chief Execu
Hi all,
If you check their website you will see why it would not make so much
sense for the chapter to co-ordinate this.
all the best,
Fabian
(User:Leutha)
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:18:33 +0100
> From: Thomas Dalton
> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l]
Set up an "UK office hours" on IRC like the Foundation does. By the way,
did you ever read Asimov's Foundation? They thought they were writing an
encyclopedia as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_%28novel%29#The_Encyclopedists
--
Doug
On 27 September 2012 14:11, Jon Davies wrote:
People seem to want to meet face to face and exchange real words - can't
imagine why? Perhaps the visit to the pub afterwards?
On 27 September 2012 15:47, rexx wrote:
> Set up an "UK office hours" on IRC like the Foundation does. By the way,
> did you ever read Asimov's Foundation? They thought
We only had faster payments enabled on our bank last month. That said, it
could do with changing - I'll put it on my to do list next time we review
the policy.
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No
I see Jon has gone through the 2013 plan cutting it back:
http://uk.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=2013_Activity_Plan&diff=29303&oldid=29136
With a comment on the talk page saying: "adjusted to reflect board
agreement to draw back on 2013 commitments".
I don't know if my suggestion to it cut it
Hi Tom;
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> I see Jon has gone through the 2013 plan cutting it back:
>
>
> http://uk.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=2013_Activity_Plan&diff=29303&oldid=29136
>
> With a comment on the talk page saying: "adjusted to reflect board
> agreement to
On 27 September 2012 18:15, Chris Keating wrote:
> Hi Tom;
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Thomas Dalton
> wrote:
>>
>> I see Jon has gone through the 2013 plan cutting it back:
>>
>>
>> http://uk.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=2013_Activity_Plan&diff=29303&oldid=29136
>>
>> With a comment
Obviously be interested in this debate. I think another possibility is to
use a UK wiki talk page as a basis for the talk. One problem is agenda as
WSC notes its very easy to have 4 parallel threads which just prevent any
resolution or understanding of more than one thread.
I'd be up for Jon's bee
Well if you look at the costs of VLE, for example, there are hosting and
development costs and then the costs of writing new modules. £4.5K would
still buy quite a few new modules, just not as many as £9.5K would - and
asyou say, there's always next year. Similarly I would expect that a
one-day GLA
On Sep 27, 2012 10:29 PM, "rexx" wrote:
>
> Well if you look at the costs of VLE, for example, there are hosting and
development costs and then the costs of writing new modules. £4.5K would
still buy quite a few new modules, just not as many as £9.5K would - and
asyou say, there's always next year
On the contrary, I really do get it: you don't think it matters what gets
cancelled; and I disagree. You don't think we can deliver the planned
programme; and I disagree.
--
Doug
On 27 September 2012 22:41, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2012 10:29 PM, "rexx" wrote:
> >
> > Well if you lo
17 matches
Mail list logo
