On 10 Aug 2012, at 19:58, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On 10 August 2012 10:00, Jon Davies wrote:
>
>> Nice discussion guys but...
>>
>> There was a technical issue that was rightly pointed out that did present a
>> possible risk to the charity.
>
> How so? (I did ask the what the issue was, in pri
On 11 August 2012 22:22, Michael Peel wrote:
> As I understand it, the main issue surrounds how the titles on these
> business cards interact with our liability insurance, since having specific
> titles increases the risk of volunteers being viewed as being staff members
> and hence us being more
On 11 August 2012 22:22, Michael Peel wrote:
> As I understand it, the main issue surrounds how the titles on these business
> cards interact with our liability insurance, since having specific titles
> increases the risk of volunteers being viewed as being staff members and
> hence us being mo
On 11/08/12 22:22, Michael Peel wrote:
As I understand it, the main issue surrounds how the titles on these business
cards interact with our liability insurance, since having specific titles
increases the risk of volunteers being viewed as being staff members and hence
us being more liable for
Of course not. This typifies the doomsday mentality that seems to paralyse the
board when it comes to delegating anything or to anyone who isn't a trustee
representing (or even being seen to possibly represent) the chapter.
Harry Mitchell
http://enwp.org/User:HJ
Phone: 024 7698 0977
Skype: ha
We turn a blind eye to the actions of our trustee's pretty effectively and they
really do represent the chapter so I see no reason why the same cannot apply to
our members.
Seddon
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:06:46 +0100
From: hjmitch...@ymail.com
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re:
