[Wikimediauk-l] A V Denham

2012-05-22 Thread Edward at Logic Museum
Gordon writes Time to return another "town". how about this quaint little hamlet (started as WikiProject in 2002)? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_London How ironic. I had several London articles deleted or cut short as a result of the absurd 'community ban' that is stil

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] A V Denham

2012-05-22 Thread Thomas Dalton
News Flash: Wikipedia isn't finished yet! Film at 11! On 22 May 2012 10:30, Edward at Logic Museum wrote: > Gordon writes Time to return another "town". how about this quaint > little hamlet (started as WikiProject in 2002)? > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_London > > How

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] A V Denham

2012-05-22 Thread Charles Matthews
On 22 May 2012 10:30, Edward at Logic Museum wrote: > > Does WMUK actually have any serious intentions about improving the > encyclopedia? I can't speak for that. Clearly many UK Wikimedians do, but the chapter is not directly concerned with content (as such). Edward, you linked to your wiki a

[Wikimediauk-l] Lum Hats in Paradise

2012-05-22 Thread brian.mcneil
Hola! From a non-Wikipedian Wikimedian - in Edinburgh - who is delighted with the response from some tentative outreach work. I spend around an hour this morning touring Edingburgh's Central Library with Fiona Myles, took around 150 photos of the interior of the building, and _hope_ I've laid the

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Lum Hats in Paradise

2012-05-22 Thread Jon Davies
I hope we will be jumping at your offer! Brilliant work, On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:03 PM, wrote: > Hola! From a non-Wikipedian Wikimedian - in Edinburgh - who is delighted > with the response from some tentative outreach work. > > I spend around an hour this morning touring Edingburgh's Central

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Lum Hats in Paradise

2012-05-22 Thread brian.mcneil
Jon, The point is be nice, and respectful, to the library staff. I was having to stop laughing when Fiona was telling me that "they know a good Wikipedia article by the number of cited references". Without any input from us they've figured out how to judge article quality - they are people we want

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Lum Hats in Paradise

2012-05-22 Thread David Gerard
On 22 May 2012 13:03, wrote: > Given the piss-poor representation up here in Scotland, I think that's a > major win. My next job, as interim 'cowboy liasion' between Wikimedia UK > and Museums Galleries Scotland is to get a few councillors calling for > all publicly funded publications to be und

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Lum Hats in Paradise

2012-05-22 Thread brian.mcneil
David, I can't get on a bus without hearing Polish, Czech, Arabic, and many more well-known European languages. These people are also 'hardened regulars' in terms of turning up in local libraries. The one I count as 'most awesome' is that the library staff, with zero input from Wikimedians, have

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Lum Hats in Paradise

2012-05-22 Thread Jon Davies
I remember Tam Dayell (I think it was him) had a little comic speech during the Thatcher years asking people to imagine Libraries had not been invented. He then pretended he was pitching to the Minister for culture. It went: " I want to build some big new buildings Really? Yes , and allow anyone

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Lum Hats in Paradise

2012-05-22 Thread HJ Mitchell
Brian, that's is fantastic. Obviously, I would hope a group of librarians might be able to recognise inline citations, but that they're so keen (and don't see Wikipedia as the root of all evil)  is brilliant. If you need a seasoned Wikipedian to lead a training session up there (for librarians

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] A V Denham

2012-05-22 Thread Gordon Joly
On 22/05/12 10:30, Edward at Logic Museum wrote: Does WMUK actually have any serious intentions about improving the encyclopedia? No. Just good PR? Gordo ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/