On 20/04/2012, Richard Symonds wrote:
...
> Following up on Fae's earlier email, if you have comments about our Chief
> Execs performance in the last six months, please email them to Fae by the
> end of today.
Hi,
I have 3 replies so far, which to my eyes appear highly valuable and
balanced feed
All,
We'll be webcasting the interesting bits of today's Monmouth WMUK Board
Meeting. You can watch by going to
http://monmouthpedia.wordpress.com/webcast/.
All the best,
Richard Symonds
Office & Development Manager
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
07885 764 613
Wikimedia UK is the operating name of
Hi all,
If you are interested in talking at WikiConference UK 2012 / the WMUK AGM at
the Science Museum in London on 12 May, then please submit a talk proposal at:
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiConference_UK_2012/Talk_Submissions
The deadline for submitting a proposal is the 1 May.
Thanks,
M
Hi Fae,
Not sure if this is open to staff or not but for my part, Jon has made
me feel very much a part of the team. He's supportive, encouraging and
open. He's been great to work for, and with, so far.
Stevie
On 21/04/2012 08:06, Fae wrote:
On 20/04/2012, Richard Symonds wrote:
...
Follo
On 18/04/12 15:10, Charles Matthews wrote:
Esp. the charity "is independent and recognises that it exists to
pursue its own purposes and not to carry out the policies or
directions of any other body."
Thanks for the update...
Gordo (former Trustree of registered charirty).
___
On 20/04/12 14:43, Richard Symonds wrote:
Following up on Fae's earlier email, if you have comments about our
Chief Execs performance in the last six months, please email them to
Fae by the end of today.
Huh?
I am now catching up, and it is Saturday 21st is this a race?
If you like ra
On 21 April 2012 20:06, Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 20/04/12 14:43, Richard Symonds wrote:
>>
>>
>> Following up on Fae's earlier email, if you have comments about our Chief
>> Execs performance in the last six months, please email them to Fae by the
>> end of today.
>>
> Huh?
>
> I am now catching up
[[London Marathon]] could do with some TLC
Tom
On 21 April 2012 20:15, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 21 April 2012 20:06, Gordon Joly wrote:
> > On 20/04/12 14:43, Richard Symonds wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Following up on Fae's earlier email, if you have comments about our
> Chief
> >> Execs performa
On 21/04/12 20:15, Thomas Dalton wrote:
Is everything clearer now?
Many thanks.
Gordo
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
I am very concerned that postings to this list appear to be specific to
the business of WMUK, a charity registered in England and Wales. The set
of members of this email list and the set of members of the charity are
distinct. I am a member of both.
Regards,
Gordo
On 21 April 2012 21:19, Gordon Joly wrote:
>
> I am very concerned that postings to this list appear to be specific to
> the business of WMUK, a charity registered in England and Wales. The set of
> members of this email list and the set of members of the charity are
> distinct. I am a member of
On 21 April 2012 21:19, Gordon Joly wrote:
>
> I am very concerned that postings to this list appear to be specific to the
> business of WMUK, a charity registered in England and Wales. The set of
> members of this email list and the set of members of the charity are
> distinct. I am a member of b
On 21 April 2012 21:41, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 21 April 2012 21:19, Gordon Joly wrote:
>> I am very concerned that postings to this list appear to be specific to the
>> business of WMUK, a charity registered in England and Wales. The set of
>> members of this email list and the set of members
On 21 Apr 2012, at 21:24, Thomas Morton wrote:
> The Chapter and the UK community are distinct, certainly. And this list does
> get a lot of use for Chapter business - less so for general community issues.
I'm not sure why the two of you are trying to draw this line in the sand, since
I don't
On 21 April 2012 22:23, Michael Peel wrote:
>
> On 21 Apr 2012, at 21:24, Thomas Morton wrote:
>
> > The Chapter and the UK community are distinct, certainly. And this list
> does get a lot of use for Chapter business - less so for general community
> issues.
>
> I'm not sure why the two of you a
On 21 April 2012 22:51, Thomas Morton wrote:
> Hmm. That line in the sand seems critical.
>
> I'd hate for it to reach a point whereby to be a UK Wikimedian meant being
> part of Wikimedia UK. I consider those two roles, for myself, to be
> distinct. There are thousands of UK Wikimedians with no i
On 21 April 2012 23:01, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 21 April 2012 22:51, Thomas Morton
> wrote:
> > Hmm. That line in the sand seems critical.
> >
> > I'd hate for it to reach a point whereby to be a UK Wikimedian meant
> being
> > part of Wikimedia UK. I consider those two roles, for myself, to b
On 21 April 2012 23:15, Thomas Morton wrote:
> Yes.
>
> But, if someone wants sod all to do with the chapter then that is entirely
> up to them. And arguably the chapter shouldn't interpose itself in such a
> way as to stop those people having their own discussions.
>
> That group is the majority
On 21 April 2012 23:19, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 21 April 2012 23:15, Thomas Morton
> wrote:
> > Yes.
> >
> > But, if someone wants sod all to do with the chapter then that is
> entirely
> > up to them. And arguably the chapter shouldn't interpose itself in such a
> > way as to stop those peopl
19 matches
Mail list logo
