Hi Jon
Have you tried to use an OCR ?
You would be able to get back the content and put it back in a spreadsheet.
Best,
--
Christophe
On 3 April 2012 21:10, Thehelpfulone wrote:
> It's not easy I'm afraid - I've run it through a couple of automatic
> converters, but the PDF format is horrib
Jon,
I have some decent OCR software at work - will try running it through that
this afternoon/evening. Do you have a deadline?
On 4 April 2012 07:50, Jon Davies wrote:
> Thanks for trying - all my fault - accidentally erased two thirds of the
> document :(
>
> Quoting Thehelpfulone :
>
> It's
No urgent deadline - about 16th of April in reality. Thanks.
Quoting James Farrar :
Jon,
I have some decent OCR software at work - will try running it through that
this afternoon/evening. Do you have a deadline?
On 4 April 2012 07:50, Jon Davies wrote:
Thanks for trying - all my fault - ac
On 03/04/12 16:14, Jon Davies wrote:
Probably impossible but can anyone take this table and convert it back
into something editable - open office by preference.
:(
http://uk.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:FiveYearPlanFirstdraft.odt-2.pdf&page=1
--
This is PDF 1.3 format.
There are n
All sorted now folks! Thanks for your help :-)
Richard Symonds
Office& Development Manager
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0992
--
Wikimedia UK is the operating name of Wiki UK Limited, a Charitable Company
Registered in England and Wales, No: 6741827. Charity No:1144513 Office: 4th
Floor, Develop
Fantastic! John Rylands is an incredible place - it's more like a
cathedral than a library.
Richard Symonds
Office& Development Manager
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0992
--
Wikimedia UK is the operating name of Wiki UK Limited, a Charitable Company
Registered in England and Wales, No: 6741827.
On 4 April 2012 12:11, Richard Symonds wrote:
> Fantastic! John Rylands is an incredible place - it's more like a cathedral
> than a library.
When I heard Alain de Botton's "atheist temple" idea, my first thought
was "this building ... will it have a lot of *books* in it?"
- d.
_
On 03/04/12 20:10, Thehelpfulone wrote:
It's not easy I'm afraid - I've run it through a couple of automatic
converters, but the PDF format is horrible such that each individual
letter is made up of more than one graph bit, where as a "proper" pdf
would be each letter is only one graphic. Unles
(Apologies for replying out of sync)
It's great to hear that they're still interested in pursuing the partnership. I
thought the Wikilounge was very successful, and I've long thought that we don't
do enough in Manchester, despite having a community there that could do wonders
with a push in the
Yes - great isn't it!
How was Coventry for you?
Quoting HJ Mitchell :
(Apologies for replying out of sync)
It's great to hear that they're still interested in pursuing the
partnership. I thought the Wikilounge was very successful, and I've
long thought that we don't do enough in Manchest
Of course, there are other areas in dire need of attention - I'm amazed that we
do nothing the other side of the Pennines, for example.
Coventry was brilliant, thanks. I think we recruited a few new editors, got
some articles written and some images donated. I wrote a brief report
at http://uk
Is there any possibility of having question answered?
I am somewhat dissapointed at this list no longer being publically archived.
Seddon
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:32:21 +0100
> From: richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk
> To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] List ar
12 matches
Mail list logo
