Thanks for the reply Katie. Pleased to see you have thought about it. It is
so frequently sold as a "women's issue" as its an easy narrative to
conflate our editor bias with systemic information bias. But its counter
productive IMO.
cheers
Roger
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 15:06, Katie Crampton <
kati
Hi Roger
Yes it's covered in the videos, especially in Victoria's interview. I have
yet to interview Alice and Lucy, but I know they acknowledge the allies we
have in male editors. As it's our first year doing the videos and there are
only 5 Mondays in March, we felt these were the people we wante
Thanks Katie,
This is good news, but it does continue the idea that the gender gap is a
women's problem.
This is much too important to leave to < 20% of our editors but maybe
these interviews will say that. I hope so.
There have been >45 women in red editathons organised by Ewan and they
sho
Hi all
We've done a series of interviews with some great women who are closing the
gender gap on Wikipedia and its sister projects for Women's History Month.
They'll be released every Monday in March at 4pm on our YouTube.
First up is Kira Wisniewski, Executive Director at Art+Feminism, going liv
