On 31/07/2011 15:26, Chris Keating wrote:
On 30/07/2011 16:18, Chris Keating wrote:
> I'm very pleased to say that our long-planned collaboration with the
> National Maritime Museum is now happening.
>
> They have released a lot of info from their internal research on
Roy
> On 30/07/2011 16:18, Chris Keating wrote:
> > I'm very pleased to say that our long-planned collaboration with the
> > National Maritime Museum is now happening.
> >
> > They have released a lot of info from their internal research on Royal
> > Navy warships on their website:
> >
> http://www.nmm
On 30/07/2011 16:18, Chris Keating wrote:
> I'm very pleased to say that our long-planned collaboration with the
> National Maritime Museum is now happening.
>
> They have released a lot of info from their internal research on Royal
> Navy warships on their website:
> http://www.nmm.ac.uk/researc
>
>
> > Good point. I don't suppose you know how many of them are British
> > *war*ships?
>
> Caw. You're hard to please.
>
> Here are a few
>
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/StateLibQld_royal_navy
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/StateLibQld_British
>
>
Brilli
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Chris Keating
wrote:
>
>
> Good point. I don't suppose you know how many of them are British
> *war*ships?
Caw. You're hard to please.
Here are a few
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/StateLibQld_royal_navy
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Speci
>
>
>
> Fantastic. Has someone notified the WP Ships project?
Yes. :-)
> The State
> Library of Queensland collaboration resulted in 5000 images of ships
> being uploaded to Commons,
and a lot of these are UK ships.
Good point. I don't suppose you know how many of them are British
*war*shi
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Chris Keating
wrote:
> I'm very pleased to say that our long-planned collaboration with the
> National Maritime Museum is now happening.
> They have released a lot of info from their internal research on Royal Navy
> warships on their website:
> http://www.nmm.ac.u
I suspect that, if we end up in the situation where we've improved a given
article as much as possible given the extra information they're providing (and
particularly if we go a step further than this and incorporate sources that
they haven't encountered or haven't managed to utilise), and if a
I can ask - particularly if there is a way to phrase the request in the
context of this project.
On Saturday, July 30, 2011, geni wrote:
> On 30 July 2011 16:18, Chris Keating wrote:
>> I'm very pleased to say that our long-planned collaboration with the
>> National Maritime Museum is now happen
On 30 July 2011 16:18, Chris Keating wrote:
> I'm very pleased to say that our long-planned collaboration with the
> National Maritime Museum is now happening.
> They have released a lot of info from their internal research on Royal Navy
> warships on their website:
> http://www.nmm.ac.uk/research
I'm very pleased to say that our long-planned collaboration with the
National Maritime Museum is now happening.
They have released a lot of info from their internal research on Royal Navy
warships on their website:
http://www.nmm.ac.uk/researchers/research-areas-and-projects/warship-histories/
(it
text", as we're
>> definitely not talking about user-compiled info, and hopefully it does
very
>> much meet the goals of Wikisource.
>>
>> Is there anyone here who is involved with Wikisource who can offer an
>> opinion?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
goals of Wikisource.
>
> Is there anyone here who is involved with Wikisource who can offer an
> opinion?
>
> Chris
>
> > Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 19:47:45 +0000
>
> > From: werespielchequ...@gmail.com
> > To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Subject:
00
> From: werespielchequ...@gmail.com
> To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] National Maritime Museum collaboration
>
> Perhaps it would be appropriate to load their material to WikiSource
> rather than directly to Wikipedia
> http://en.wikisource.org
Perhaps it would be appropriate to load their material to WikiSource
rather than directly to Wikipedia
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page
Then we can cite it in Wikipedia, or if the license is compatible and
they have an article where we don't we could even import bits into
Wikipedia.
Some h
>
> Deryck - yes, it would be bizarre if Wikipedia told the National Maritime
> Museum their work wasn't up to our standards. However, because it's unusual
> to get information of this nature and in this format, I'm keen to establish
> a consensus at the outset rather than risk an argument about it
this nature and in this format, I'm keen to establish a
consensus at the outset rather than risk an argument about it later.
Chris
> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:55:14 +
> From: werespielchequ...@gmail.com
> To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Nation
We have a London meetup in a fortnight, is it possible we could
discuss this there?
WSC
On 26 February 2011 11:43, Roger Bamkin wrote:
> Brilliant news - not only does it tell us about the ships but also about the
> many notable brits on the ships
>
> Well done in anticipation
>
> On 26 February
Amazing news. I'm also amused by how pedantic we are in discussing whether
it's a reliable source.
Deryck
On 26 February 2011 11:43, Roger Bamkin wrote:
> Brilliant news - not only does it tell us about the ships but also about
> the many notable brits on the ships
>
> Well done in anticipation
Brilliant news - not only does it tell us about the ships but also about the
many notable brits on the ships
Well done in anticipation
On 26 February 2011 09:27, Chris Keating wrote:
> It looks very likely that the National Maritime Museum are going to release
> a significant amount if informati
It looks very likely that the National Maritime Museum are going to release a
significant amount if information gleaned from their archives under CC-BY-SA so
we can make use of it.
This would include information on the service history of some 20,000-odd Royal
Navy warships.
More information on
21 matches
Mail list logo
