http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/9581813/Wikipedia-charity-faces-investigation-over-trustee-conflict-of-interest.html
Bit long?
bit.ly has three saves already!
Gordo
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
htt
On 3 October 2012 12:16, Michael Peel wrote:
> Of course, that still wouldn't be right - 'through banners on Wikipedia'
> would be more accurate. Getting media coverage 100% accurate is difficult (if
> only they used wikis…) - sometimes inaccuracies just have to be lived with,
> as grating as t
On 3 Oct 2012, at 12:12, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 3 October 2012 11:15, Andrew Turvey wrote:
>> I though this was a largely accurate article without any major errors. Far
>> better than most media articles!
>
> The main body of the article is very good. The summary at the top is
> simplified
On 3 October 2012 11:15, Andrew Turvey wrote:
> I though this was a largely accurate article without any major errors. Far
> better than most media articles!
The main body of the article is very good. The summary at the top is
simplified to the point of being inaccurate. The main article
specific
I though this was a largely accurate article without any major errors. Far
better than most media articles!
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> The DT are reporting that Wikimedia UK has been "barred from
> processing donations":
>
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wiki
We are on to it.
On 3 October 2012 10:29, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> The DT are reporting that Wikimedia UK has been "barred from
> processing donations":
>
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/9581813/Wikipedia-charity-faces-investigation-over-trustee-conflict-of-interest.html
>
> C
The DT are reporting that Wikimedia UK has been "barred from
processing donations":
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/9581813/Wikipedia-charity-faces-investigation-over-trustee-conflict-of-interest.html
Can we get this error corrected ASAP? It's also in the Wikipedia
article o
