Works fine on my PlusNet and JANET connections, FWIW.
Mike
On 6 Dec 2008, at 20:55, Paul Williams wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 8:43 PM, David Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> you need to try the link, and if it doesn't work, contact your
> ISP and ask WTF.
>
>
> HTTP 404 error on Ecli
2008/12/7 AndrewRT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Dec 6, 11:12 pm, "Alison Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Addendum. The IWF state they have an appeals process, though I can't find
>> further details in their FAQ. They are also associated with CEOP whom
>> invited me earlier this year to talk
Good news! If anyone gets in touch with them, could you also mention
Wikipedia Loves Art at the V&A?
Thanks
On Dec 6, 7:38 pm, joseph seddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Heya guys,
>
> Whilst looking for some interesting photo's I stumbled accross a flicker
> group from oxford, they are very act
Hi Alison
On Dec 6, 11:12 pm, "Alison Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Addendum. The IWF state they have an appeals process, though I can't find
> further details in their FAQ. They are also associated with CEOP whom
> invited me earlier this year to talk to a conference they were organising
> Thanks, but I got in via a different route. Thing is I suspect that issue
> will be catching many others too. This whole thing is a disaster sfaiac
> for editors and readers alike.
Indeed. There's not a lot we can do about it, though... hopefully the
press will take the "Evil ISPs censor the won
On Sun, December 7, 2008 00:15, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2008/12/7 Alison Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Side-effect of logging out to check further, then realising I don't know
>> my own password as I rely on the computer to remember it for me ...
>>
>> "Login error
>> Your IP address is blocked fr
2008/12/7 Alison Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Side-effect of logging out to check further, then realising I don't know
> my own password as I rely on the computer to remember it for me ...
>
> "Login error
> Your IP address is blocked from editing, and so is not allowed to use the
> password reco
Side-effect of logging out to check further, then realising I don't know
my own password as I rely on the computer to remember it for me ...
"Login error
Your IP address is blocked from editing, and so is not allowed to use the
password recovery function to prevent abuse"
gah!
Alison
__
> In my mind it
> would be far better for them to ask for the removal of the image rather
> than block an entire article.
Absolutely - asking nicely is generally a good first step in resolving
any dispute.
> Indeed the article could happily have the
> later album cover and just refer to the earli
2008/12/6 Thomas Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/12/6 David Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> However, I do suggest that all readers of this list try the pages and
>> share the results they get (and their ISP).
>
> I can access it from my university internet connection (through JANET).
>
> It's ver
(an error in sending meant my response wasn't actually in the message ...
duped below correctly)
On Sat, December 6, 2008 22:47, geni wrote:
> Ideally they won't pick
> it up. If they do the story will be "wikipedia hosting child porn".
> Trying to tackle that head on is suicidally stupid. Their r
2008/12/6 geni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/12/6 Alison Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The bigger issue at this exact moment *is* this exact moment. It is late
>> on a Saturday night and realistically the next news cycle that we could
>> get in to is not until Monday. As such it may be premature to
On Sat, December 6, 2008 22:47, geni wrote:
> 2008/12/6 Alison Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The bigger issue at this exact moment *is* this exact moment. It is late
>> on a Saturday night and realistically the next news cycle that we could
>> get in to is not until Monday. As such it may be prem
2008/12/6 Alison Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The bigger issue at this exact moment *is* this exact moment. It is late
> on a Saturday night and realistically the next news cycle that we could
> get in to is not until Monday. As such it may be premature to announce
> anything further at this pres
> The way that I negotiated the trademark agreement does, I believe, permit
> me (on behalf of both organisations) to speak publicly on this matter
> should I wish to do so.
Is it not the standard chapter agreement? That agreement includes the
clause: "The Chapter shall seek to ensure in all deali
On Sat, December 6, 2008 21:35, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> You could, but would it really be appropriate? You have the license to
> use the trademark, but not permission to speak on behalf of WMF. Since
> it is WMF's page being blocked it should really be WMF making a
> statement - there isn't much WMU
Just for completeness, I'm on O2 broadband and I get the 404 trying to
access the Virgin Killer article and image. Unfortunately as the account
is not in my name, I don't think that I can make a complaint?
The article is (currently) available via the google.co.uk cache, and
a google.co.uk image
> The IWF really doesn't want people looking too closely into what it
> does and how it does it. That would only inform the criminals, don't
> you know. As such, I expect this one to quietly disappear,
> particularly if everyone here with a failed connection to Wikipedia
> makes a point to call the
2008/12/6 Alison Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, December 6, 2008 21:12, joseph seddon wrote:
>> May i point out that atm wiki uk ltd is in no way officially affiliated
>> with WMF atm, it wouldnt be a professional move to
>> make a statement.
>
> As the current (though not much longer!) hol
On Sat, December 6, 2008 21:12, joseph seddon wrote:
> May i point out that atm wiki uk ltd is in no way officially affiliated
> with WMF atm, it wouldnt be a professional move to
> make a statement.
As the current (though not much longer!) holder of the licence to use the
trademark in the UK, Wik
2008/12/6 Thomas Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/12/6 joseph seddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> May i point out that atm wiki uk ltd is in no way officially affiliated with
>> WMF atm, it wouldnt be a professional move to
>> make a statement.
> Indeed, at this point "WMUK" refers to WER Ltd. not W
2008/12/6 joseph seddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> May i point out that atm wiki uk ltd is in no way officially affiliated with
> WMF atm, it wouldnt be a professional move to
> make a statement.
Indeed, at this point "WMUK" refers to WER Ltd. not Wiki UK Ltd.. Wiki
UK Ltd. certainly should be doing a
May i point out that atm wiki uk ltd is in no way officially affiliated with
WMF atm, it wouldnt be a professional move to
make a statement.> Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 21:11:15 +> From: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Subject:
Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Fw
2008/12/6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am. Ok i'm not part of wmuk, but I do think wmuk should make a move.
>
> Why would you not send the wn article to all your press contacts, or even
> better issue a PR. Anyway, make a move and exist.
>
> This is the occasion to get you known :)
Because it's not
I am. Ok i'm not part of wmuk, but I do think wmuk should make a move.
Why would you not send the wn article to all your press contacts, or even
better issue a PR. Anyway, make a move and exist.
This is the occasion to get you known :)
Christophe
-Original Message-
From: "David Gerard
2008/12/6 geni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Internet watch foundation are not the authorities. They also don't
> tell sites if they are Flagged (see their FAQ). We only found out due
> to a chance information leak and the shear size of the site
> highlighting some technical issues in the filtering.
Th
2008/12/6 Thomas Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I can access it from my university internet connection (through JANET).
>
> It's very strange - if it is the Virgin Killer picture then why now?
> That picture have been there for ages and has been complained about
> plenty of times before. The conclus
2008/12/6 Paul Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 8:43 PM, David Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> you need to try the link, and if it doesn't work, contact your
>> ISP and ask WTF.
> HTTP 404 error on Eclipse Internet for page and image. Circumventable by
> going to http:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 8:43 PM, David Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you need to try the link, and if it doesn't work, contact your
> ISP and ask WTF.
>
>
HTTP 404 error on Eclipse Internet for page and image. Circumventable by
going to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virgin_Killer
2008/12/6 David Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am not suggesting that WMUK do anything about this whatsoever.
I doubt there is anything WMUK can do, even if it was a good idea for
them to get involved.
> However, I do suggest that all readers of this list try the pages and
> share the results th
I am not suggesting that WMUK do anything about this whatsoever.
However, I do suggest that all readers of this list try the pages and
share the results they get (and their ISP).
More specifically, if you're on any of:
* Be/O2/Telefonica
* Virgin Media
* EasyNet/UK Online/Sky
* PlusNet
* Demon
*
Heya guys,
Whilst looking for some interesting photo's I stumbled accross a flicker group
from oxford, they are very active it seems,
they hold meet ups and are looking into running an exhibition next year. I
think that it is of vital importance that we get in
touch with these people and see
The next London Wikimeet is at the usual place, and again on the
second Sunday of the month at 1pm (14th December 2008).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/London_16
http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/1375038
Upcoming says:-
Penderel's Oak
283-288 High Holborn
London, England WC1
33 matches
Mail list logo
