Seems solved on github, does it work good? Now, how are your experiences
with the TFA/Hideki Anemometer compared to the WH3080 Anemometer?
farma...@gmail.com schrieb am Donnerstag, 18. August 2022 um 15:41:41 UTC+2:
> as soon as we have solved the uv problem we will talk about it again
>
> Il g
as soon as we have solved the uv problem we will talk about it again
Il giorno giovedì 18 agosto 2022 alle 03:47:20 UTC+2 f4n...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
> Just out of interest: why are you using the TFA/Hideki Sensor for wind,
> instead of the WH3080? As far as I know, the TFA samples wind gusts
Just out of interest: why are you using the TFA/Hideki Sensor for wind,
instead of the WH3080? As far as I know, the TFA samples wind gusts much
slower, about 11 seconds, resulting in too low wind gust readings. Compared
to the 1 second sampling of the WHx080 models (fastest gust out of 48x1s i
I just realized it never worked with my WHx080 too (only the usb instance)
as I use the radiation from the WH65 in my SDR setup. A quick look into
sdr.py reveals why: There is no parsing of uv data for class
FOWHx080Packet(Packet) - Only for class FOWH3080Packet(Packet)
First, make a backup of
I use 2 other sensors
one is tfa wind and the other is acurite lightning sensor
I don't use the wind sensor of the wh3080
my skin inside the current.inc the right strings of UV and radiation but
the result is UV N / A and radiation N / A
Il giorno martedì 16 agosto 2022 alle 17:46:27 UTC+2 Peppe
good evening,
I will try first of all to put order and to answer your questions:
the weather station is a froggit wh3080 with separate sensors at 433 mhz,
therefore the old model. Here is the photo in jpg
[image: Profi-radio-Stazione-Meteo-wh3080-luce-UV-USB.jpg]
IThis is the result of what the st
I currently don't have it in front of me and am just writing from my phone,
but maybe i can give a few hints:
Which sdr command do you use in your config file? Try adding:
-Y classic
Which WHx080 model do you have? Is it the old one with separated sensors or
the newer all in one sensor array?
can anyone help me?
Il giorno martedì 9 agosto 2022 alle 16:49:48 UTC+2 Peppe ha scritto:
> sorry, the last line is wrong
> this is what I wanted to write
> radiation = radiation.225.FOWH3080Packet
>
> Il giorno mar 9 ago 2022 alle ore 16:46 Peppe ha
> scritto:
>
>> good evening
>> I put the tw
sorry, the last line is wrong
this is what I wanted to write
radiation = radiation.225.FOWH3080Packet
Il giorno mar 9 ago 2022 alle ore 16:46 Peppe ha
scritto:
> good evening
> I put the two lines on the sensor map but it doesn't work. I am writing
> you a series of attempts made by me along wit
good evening
I put the two lines on the sensor map but it doesn't work. I am writing you
a series of attempts made by me along with your suggestions:
UV = uv_index.225.FOWHx080Packet
radiation = light.225.FOWHx080Packet
radiation = radiation.225.FOWHx080Packet
UV = uv_index.225.FOWH3080Packet
radia
first of all thank you so much for answering me. I was wrong in
transcribing the syslog.
this is correct: {"time": "2022-08-07 13:26:39", "model":
"Fineoffset-WHx080", "subtype": 2, "uv_sensor_id": 225, "uv_status": " OK
"," uv_index ": 2," lux ": 32082.000," wm ": 46,972," mic ":" CRC "}
I'll
I've never seen "*End*offset-WHx080", not sure if this is available in
sdr.py, but maybe I'm wrong.
Mine works with following sensor map entries:
UV = uv_index.*.FOWHx080Packet
radiation = light.*.FOWHx080Packet
You can replace *** with your ID (necessary if there are other WHx080
stations ar
I used a weeewx 4.8.0 installation using the weewx-sdr driver updated on
February 12th of this year and capturing the sensors at 433 mhz with a
Nesdr key;
the sdr.py file is from January 22nd
Il giorno domenica 7 agosto 2022 alle 15:32:29 UTC+2 Peppe ha scritto:
> Hello everyone, I ask you for
13 matches
Mail list logo
