Re: [weewx-user] Re: gw1000 - wh41 wh57 battery values

2021-04-22 Thread Graham Eddy
this reminds me strongly of windDir value when windSpeed==0 > On 22 Apr 2021, at 3:46 pm, gjr80 wrote: > > Sensor signal level 0 is a valid signal level so we cannot just omit a sensor > entirely just because the GW1000 reports signal level = 0. At the same time > we know that the battery stat

Re: [weewx-user] Re: gw1000 - wh41 wh57 battery values

2021-04-21 Thread gjr80
I can see what is going on now. To understand you need a little GW1000 API background. To obtain the sensor observation data there is a particular API call that is made that returns the sensor observation data. This data previously included a block of sensor battery state/signal level data but

Re: [weewx-user] Re: gw1000 - wh41 wh57 battery values

2021-04-21 Thread Graham Eddy
an extract from test system - RPi with gw1000 as driver > On 21 Apr 2021, at 6:30 pm, gjr80 wrote: > > Either way post the logged data here and I can decode what the driver was > receiving. —logged config— Apr 21 21:33:09 stringybark weewx-gw1000[341] DEBUG __main__: Initializi

[weewx-user] Re: gw1000 - wh41 wh57 battery values

2021-04-21 Thread gjr80
Can’t say why you are seeing what you are seeing but if you are running the GW1000 API driver we can look at the raw bytes coming from the GW1000 and see if the issue is the GW1000/sensors or the driver. You can do one of two things. You can set debug = 3 and restart WeeWX to have the driver lo