Re: [weewx-user] Ecowitt Gateway Driver, WH57 and lightning data [4]

2024-06-26 Thread 'michael.k...@gmx.at' via weewx-user
Today I recorded this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaAj23eqhh4 I have no other explanation than the WH57 reports lightning strikes more often than every 79s. michael.k...@gmx.at schrieb am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2024 um 21:15:41 UTC+2: > Let's boil it down to this sentence: > > > That a SDR shou

Re: [weewx-user] Ecowitt Gateway Driver, WH57 and lightning data [4]

2024-06-04 Thread 'michael.k...@gmx.at' via weewx-user
Let's boil it down to this sentence: > That a SDR should be superior here is by no means true - but of course a SDR can be used. If the sensor emits every single lightning event, and the console can only be polled, or set up to send data in a fixed interval: it is by all means true! It is po

Re: [weewx-user] Ecowitt Gateway Driver, WH57 and lightning data [4]

2024-06-04 Thread vince
For others lost in the arguing :-) the wiki page is at https://meshka.eu/Ecowitt/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=start#wh57 and the discussion about their APIs is at https://meshka.eu/Ecowitt/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=start#apis_application_programming_interfaces It was interesting to see some discussion in th

[weewx-user] Ecowitt Gateway Driver, WH57 and lightning data [4]

2024-06-04 Thread 'Rainer Lang' via weewx-user
this is all clear and long stated in the WiKi - the 79 interval gets restarted once a discharge is detected. But thinking that a SDR would receive values more often and faster than a normal Ecowitt console (that was the statement I was referring to) is an illusion. That's at least how the stat