Hi Florian,
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> Didn't manage to reply to your Alfresco mail yet, but will do soon. However,
> feel free to available OpenID, so we can test it already. :)
OK, I will investigate the subject and post back in the coming days. ;-)
--
Dav
Hi,
David Nelson wrote on 2012-05-16 21:43:
OpenID can be implemented on Alfresco.
good news!
Should the LibreOffice project use it? Well, I guess you'd have to
sound out the English (and a couple of other languages, such as
Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese) documentation people to see wheth
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> * Alfresco (should we use it)
OpenID can be implemented on Alfresco.
Should the LibreOffice project use it? Well, I guess you'd have to
sound out the English (and a couple of other languages, such as
Spanish and Bra
Hi,
Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2012-05-04 21:46:
Not sure about Silverstripe - as a rather limited set of people
actually need access.. But if google federated login is enough,
there's an extension for silverstipe.
While there also is a general openID extension, I think it is not
actively main
Hi Florian, *,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
>
> Here are the results I'll send for your reference:
>
> OpenID should work:
> * MediaWiki (through extension)
> * Silverstripe (through extension): TDF, LibO, LiboBox
Not sure about Silverstripe - as a r
Hi,
I found this article related to this topic:
http://blog.gerv.net/2012/04/bugzilla-mozilla-org-browserid/
KAMI
On 04/17/2012 12:23 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote on 2012-04-17 12:21:
what about browserid support?
we didn't evaluate that yet, any input welcome.
Hi,
KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote on 2012-04-17 12:21:
what about browserid support?
we didn't evaluate that yet, any input welcome. :)
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger, Chairman of the Board
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
The Document Foundation, Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, German
what about browserid support?
2012/4/17, Rainer Bielefeld :
> Florian Effenberger schrieb:
>
>> OpenID should work:
>> * Bugzilla (through extension, if we host it on our own)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> because there still are lots of questions how to transfer FDO Bugzilla
> database contents to a Bugzilla hos
Florian Effenberger schrieb:
OpenID should work:
* Bugzilla (through extension, if we host it on our own)
Hi,
because there still are lots of questions how to transfer FDO Bugzilla
database contents to a Bugzilla hosted by TDF without solution, I
submitted an Enhancement request for FDO.Bu
Hello,
during the Hackfest, Mike and Robert sat together to evaluate which
services we currently run can be used with OpenID. The rationale is to
have one unified, single login for all services, and OpenID is probably
the easiest way to achieve that.
Here are the results I'll send for your r
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 20:33 +0200, Stanislas Garret wrote:
> I've some time if you want me to do some searchs about OpenID.
> But if Drew has some ideas from older times, I can wait..
>
> But yes, SSO will be needed for the foundation websites.
>
> Let me know.
>
> Stan
>
Heck I don't mind - i
I've some time if you want me to do some searchs about OpenID.
But if Drew has some ideas from older times, I can wait..
But yes, SSO will be needed for the foundation websites.
Let me know.
Stan
Le 15/10/2010 17:21, Drew Jensen a écrit :
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 17:13 +0200, Per Eriksson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 17:13 +0200, Per Eriksson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Florian Effenberger skrev 2010-10-15 17:02:
> > I like the idea of OpenID. If you all agree, let's shift that topic to
> > a larger "single sign-on" topic later on, when other important
> > services are running. :)
> >
>
> I agree
Hi,
Florian Effenberger skrev 2010-10-15 17:02:
I like the idea of OpenID. If you all agree, let's shift that topic to
a larger "single sign-on" topic later on, when other important
services are running. :)
I agree. The need is not immediate right now but will become soon. I
would suggest
Hi,
Benjamin Horst wrote on 2010-10-11 22.51:
I think OpenID would be a major benefit, and I know it would be well-received by technical members.
For the less geeky, I suggest we also support Facebook Connect. In addition to the single sign-on
benefits, it can also propagate TDF activity out t
All stuff the Big D has either built in or a relatively good module for
(facebook connect)
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Benjamin Horst wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Per Eriksson wrote:
> > Some of the pros of OpenID are:
> >
> > * No need to register additional accounts. Only the n
On Oct 11, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Per Eriksson wrote:
> Some of the pros of OpenID are:
>
> * No need to register additional accounts. Only the need to apply rights to
> accounts in enabled systems.
> * Saves time for the user.
> * Can be reused by the user for other services outside TDF.
> * Already
Hi,
Florian Effenberger skrev 2010-10-11 22:07:
I actually have that in mind, any sort of SSO -- LDAP or own OpenID,
something like that. Any input is welcome, have no real idea of it ;)
Florian
Of course SSO, as I was referring to, means that you sign on once, and
not several times with
Hi,
Per Eriksson wrote on 2010-10-11 21.40:
Do we have proposals using services such as OpenID for our infrastructure?
I actually have that in mind, any sort of SSO -- LDAP or own OpenID,
something like that. Any input is welcome, have no real idea of it ;)
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Hi,
Do we have proposals using services such as OpenID for our infrastructure?
We have a variety of services, which in end could simplify for the
active contributor by reusing login credentials from a 3rd party system,
like OpenID providers.
I am also looking for a convenient authenticatio
20 matches
Mail list logo
