Java 17? Half or Full?

2022-12-10 Thread Aaron Rosenzweig via Webobjects-dev
This is both a topic for both pure NeXT/Apple WO as well as a WOnder. Your WO deployments, are they on Java 17? Are they half or full Java 17? Please chime in. In our case, at present, we are developing and deploying on a Java 17 VM but using Java 1.8 (version 8) compliance. I call this “Java

Re: Java 17? Half or Full?

2022-12-10 Thread ocs--- via Webobjects-dev
Hi there, we are “Java 17 None At All”. For development, we use javas 1.8-11 (actually a couple years ago I've tried 12, bumped into some problems — can't recall details, too long ago — and from then up to now, I stick with 11 or lower). Deployment is mostly 1.8, but there's one ancient Xserve

AW: Java 17? Half or Full?

2022-12-10 Thread Wolfgang Hartmann via Webobjects-dev
Hello, That the WO-Jars are closed source makes it really hard to move to the new Java-Module-System. But I had a similar problem once and was able to solve it. Maybe this can help here. But that requirement did not involve My requirement was: * I wanted to deploy a Java-Background-Service

Re: AW: Java 17? Half or Full?

2022-12-10 Thread Ray Kiddy via Webobjects-dev
These are great ideas. How hard do you think it would be to implement them? By the way, you point out that the WO license does not allow you to decompile the jars. I would suggest that unzipping the jar files to get a individual class files is not "decompiling" anything. If one is decompiling

Re: AW: Java 17? Half or Full?

2022-12-10 Thread Wolfgang Hartmann via Webobjects-dev
Hy, You are right on the decompiling-part. But the licence also states that you are not allowed to distribute the jars on your own. Only Apple is allowed to distribute them. But it seems Apple does not care anymore about WebObjects. For this module-test one could also do a manual approach, beca