> Le 2015-12-12 à 18:38, Ricardo Parada a écrit :
>
> Hi Pascal
>
> Containers sound like a great topic for a WOWODC presentation. I would love
> to learn about how to use them for example to have a WO environment with
> java, MySQL, wotaskd / JavaMonitor. Is that the kind of stuff they would
Hi Pascal
Containers sound like a great topic for a WOWODC presentation. I would love to
learn about how to use them for example to have a WO environment with java,
MySQL, wotaskd / JavaMonitor. Is that the kind of stuff they would be used for?
And how do I create a container and use it with a
> Le 2015-12-03 à 22:09, Samuel Pelletier a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I never use a system provided apache, php or other sensitive software for a
> server, I recommend to build from source, this allows to control when the
> update are applied and locate your config files where you want them.
>
> I
Hi,
I never use a system provided apache, php or other sensitive software for a
server, I recommend to build from source, this allows to control when the
update are applied and locate your config files where you want them.
I even have multiple apache on the same server, some with php other with
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 8:44 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 29, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Michael Kondratov
> wrote:
>
>> What makes Linux better than OS X?
>
> Where do I start? :) In no particular order:
>
> Number of knowledgeable administrators.
> Server software packages (openstack, dock
On Nov 29, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Michael Kondratov
wrote:
> What makes Linux better than OS X?
Where do I start? :) In no particular order:
Number of knowledgeable administrators.
Server software packages (openstack, docker, etc)
Targeted at power users (doesn’t F up /usr/local, has bash complet
As a follow up, I did fix the locking up problem.
When I checked my energy saver settings it was set to sleep after 3 hours but
wake on network activity.
I can’t remember if I had it set to that before El Capitan, or if I had it set
to never sleep and El Capitan changed it. But in El Capitan
Just out of curiosity, what would be your preferred way to do this so that it
sticks through deployments? Certainly, the launch script can be edited but that
gets wiped out with a new build. There’s a few ways I suppose.
Add it to the launchd script?
Tim
UCLA GSE&IS
> On Nov 29, 2015, at 2:14
> Le 2015-11-29 à 16:09, Chuck Hill a écrit :
>
> If it is load related, I’d look at the application first. You might also be
> running low on file handles or other system resources. Linux is likely
> better configured in that respect.
Yes. For example, the default for the maximum number of
Sounds like something is using up too much memory.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 29, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote:
>
> After a couple of days running an app with virtually no load, my El Capitan
> server has been completely locking up every few hours to where I can’t even
> ssh in, req
After a couple of days running an app with virtually no load, my El Capitan
server has been completely locking up every few hours to where I can’t even ssh
in, requiring a remote power cycle to bring it back to life. I may try a
remote linux install using some combination of these pages:
http:
I’d give it more heap, that is pretty small.
On 2015-11-29, 1:14 PM, "Michael Kondratov" wrote:
>The server load stays pretty low at around 10%-15% on a 6 core Mac Pro. I’ve
>noticed that wotaskd starts up with 64MB max heap. Is it an acceptable amount
>for a 64bit system?
>
>Michael
>
>
>
The server load stays pretty low at around 10%-15% on a 6 core Mac Pro. I’ve
noticed that wotaskd starts up with 64MB max heap. Is it an acceptable amount
for a 64bit system?
Michael
> On Nov 29, 2015, at 4:09 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> If it is load related, I’d look at the application first
If it is load related, I’d look at the application first. You might also be
running low on file handles or other system resources. Linux is likely better
configured in that respect.
WO should easily be able to handle that load, but that assumes that the
application does not have have issues w
We start having issues right about 100k page views per day. Is it reasonable to
believe WO should handle it without breaking a sweat? What makes Linux better
than OS X?
Michael
> On Nov 29, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
>
>> Le 2015-11-29 à 13:19, Michael Kondratov a
>> écrit :
Crashing or hanging? Those are different. If it is crashing, do you have a
stack trace? Is it hard exit? If it is hanging, get a thread dump (sudo jstack
-f ). Or is it your app that is hanging? If the app takes too long to
respond to a wotaskd request, it can appear that the problem is wi
> Le 2015-11-29 à 13:19, Michael Kondratov a écrit
> :
>
> Hello,
> What is the most reliable deployment set up at this time?
Linux.
> It seems we are having occasional issues with wotaskd crashing or hanging. We
> are on Mac Os X 10.9 Server. Would we gain anything from using SiteConf
Tom,
Are you running Apache 2.4? Wotaskd crashing? what version of java are
you using?
Michael
> On Nov 29, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Tom Woteki wrote:
>
> I am having similar issues on an El Capitan server and would appreciate any
> advice.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Dr. Wo, his iPad Air
>
>> On
I am having similar issues on an El Capitan server and would appreciate any
advice.
Thank you.
Dr. Wo, his iPad Air
> On Nov 29, 2015, at 13:19, Michael Kondratov
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>What is the most reliable deployment set up at this time? It seems we are
> having occasional issues wi
Hello,
What is the most reliable deployment set up at this time? It seems we
are having occasional issues with wotaskd crashing or hanging. We are on Mac Os
X 10.9 Server. Would we gain anything from using SiteConfig.xml for Apache
Adaptor instead of wotaskd?
Thank you!
Michael Kondrat
20 matches
Mail list logo
