ould not
> get anything done before prototype!
>
>
>
>> On Aug 13, 2025, at 7:55 AM, Fredrik Lindgren via Webobjects-dev
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, we are using that feature in jQuery. However it seems that prototype is
>> overriding some features in native javascr
e a great fit for an
> updated/simplified Ajax-framework on the WO side (where the multipart-stuff
> isn't required/supported).
>
> Cheers,
> - hugi
>
>
>
>> On 13 Aug 2025, at 11:55, Fredrik Lindgren via Webobjects-dev
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, w
framework to avoid prototype JS can be done… but
> it’s not an easy button.
>
>> On Aug 13, 2025, at 3:43 AM, Fredrik Lindgren via Webobjects-dev
>> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to opt out of using prototype.js with the Ajax framework.
>>
>> We are
ption is to check if there is a way for prorotypes and the
> other js libraries you use to coexist.
>
> Best regards
> D.
>
> Il Mer 13 Ago 2025, 09:43 Fredrik Lindgren via Webobjects-dev
> mailto:webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com>> ha
> scritto:
>> Is there a
Is there a way to opt out of using prototype.js with the Ajax framework.
We are having problems integrating for example the quill editor due to
conflicts.
Anyone have similar problems with a solution?
/Fredrik
___
Do not post admin requests to the li
