Re: ERJGroupsSynchronizer.framework on EC2

2015-04-30 Thread Paul Hoadley
On 1 May 2015, at 1:07 pm, David Holt wrote: > Of course! You tipped me over the edge. https://wiki.wocommunity.org/display/documentation/ERJGroupsSynchronizer+Framework There's admittedly some hand-waving going on. Ideally this would all be pushed back into ERJGroupsSynchronizer.framework a

Re: ERJGroupsSynchronizer.framework on EC2

2015-04-30 Thread David Holt
Of course! Sent from my iPad > On Apr 30, 2015, at 8:14 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote: > > Hello, > > With the help of Ken Anderson, I recently got a proof-of-concept running on > AWS EC2 (in a VPC) using ERJGroupsSynchronizer.framework with some minor > modifications. Node discovery and remote sy

ERJGroupsSynchronizer.framework on EC2

2015-04-30 Thread Paul Hoadley
Hello, With the help of Ken Anderson, I recently got a proof-of-concept running on AWS EC2 (in a VPC) using ERJGroupsSynchronizer.framework with some minor modifications. Node discovery and remote synchronisation works as designed. (The short version of the problem that requires solving is th

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread David Avendasora
Chuck keeps trying to kill his liver. I don't think he's ever seen it either. Coincidence? I. Think. Not. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 30, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Hugi Thordarson wrote: > > That’s like trying to whack off a phantom limb. ___ Do not pos

Re: Wonder 7 and 8

2015-04-30 Thread Ramsey Gurley
Sounds good to me. What is the ETA on step 3? ;-) Er, merging Wonder_7? On Apr 29, 2015, at 7:44 AM, David Avendasora wrote: > Hey all > > About a year ago a bunch of work to make Wonder Java 7 compatible. But the > branch is now 86 commits behind the master branch (Wonder 6). > > I propose

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread Gavin Eadie
I don’t recall for certain, but have a nagging feeling that Apple’s inline binding implementation (which I use) is enabled by the absence of a *.wod file. It’s been years and years since I tripped over this and my memory may be faulty (it may be a zero byte *.wod has the same effect). > On Apr

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread Hugi Thordarson
Might explain it. I’ve been using inline bindings since forever but never actually deleted the .wod. That’s like trying to whack off a phantom limb. - hugi > On 30. apr. 2015, at 21:54, Gavin Eadie wrote: > > It's the missing *.wod that kills the component editor. > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 a

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread Gavin Eadie
It's the missing *.wod that kills the component editor. On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Gavin Eadie wrote: > OK .. Yosemite with none of Java, WebObjects, Eclipse, etc installed: > > Install Java SE 7, Luna 4.4.2, WOLips for Luna from Jenkins (WOLips only; > not WOLips Goodies). > Create new Wo

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread Gavin Eadie
OK .. Yosemite with none of Java, WebObjects, Eclipse, etc installed: Install Java SE 7, Luna 4.4.2, WOLips for Luna from Jenkins (WOLips only; not WOLips Goodies). Create new Wonder App from template .. frameworks aren't installed so linking complaints, but can I edit Main.WO? Yes, Main.WO is edi

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread Gavin Eadie
I’m not understanding your “uninstalling” reference, so pardon me if I’m being stupid. I deleted my entire old (v3.7) Eclipse directory [Time Machine is my friend if I need to revert to last week’s old software], downloaded a fresh Luna 4.4.2 (same release as yours), and told it to add the WOLi

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread Chuck Hill
Possibly true, but I'd need more than just "some". Not that I would be opposed to that... On 2015-04-30, 11:24 AM, "Hugi Thordarson" wrote: Heh, Dave :). And Chuck; trust me. You'll love the fermented shark once you've had some brennivín! - hugi On 29. apr. 2015, at 23:45, Chuck Hill mailt

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread Samuel Pelletier
You experience exactly the behaviour I had before my patch. Either, you are not running the same code as me or you found something else. My patch is supposed to reset the height of the WOD panel if the ratio read from the prefs is bellow 15% to make sure enough of it is visible. The crash I fix

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread Hugi Thordarson
Heh, Dave :). And Chuck; trust me. You’ll love the fermented shark once you’ve had some brennivín! - hugi > On 29. apr. 2015, at 23:45, Chuck Hill wrote: > > I still want to go there and see one of the famed “Icelandic Coffee Hoses”. > They sound awesome. The fermented shark loin… not so m

Re: Wonder 7 and 8

2015-04-30 Thread Hugi Thordarson
FWIW we've been using Java 8 on all our servers and development machines since its release. No problems. Also, lambdas, streams and default methods rock :). Considering The Legacy Burden That Must Not Be Mentioned the ride to JDK 9 might be a little rockier though… http://blog.codefx.org/java/d

Re: Wonder 7 and 8

2015-04-30 Thread Ramsey Gurley
“It’s going EOL guys! We can finally start using it!!” :D On Apr 30, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: > He was just indicating that it was an appropriate time for Wonder to be > updated for Java 7! :-P > > > On 2015-04-30, 11:11 AM, "Ken Anderson" wrote: > > and your point is? :) We

Re: Wonder 7 and 8

2015-04-30 Thread Ken Anderson
ahh ok! That makes sense :) > On Apr 30, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > > He was just indicating that it was an appropriate time for Wonder to be > updated for Java 7! :-P > > > On 2015-04-30, 11:11 AM, "Ken Anderson" wrote: > > and your point is? :) We live in EOL land! > >> On

Re: Wonder 7 and 8

2015-04-30 Thread Chuck Hill
He was just indicating that it was an appropriate time for Wonder to be updated for Java 7! :-P On 2015-04-30, 11:11 AM, "Ken Anderson" wrote: and your point is? :) We live in EOL land! On Apr 30, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Ramsey Gurley mailto:rgur...@smarthealth.com>> wrote: Java 7 appears to be

Re: Wonder 7 and 8

2015-04-30 Thread Ken Anderson
and your point is? :) We live in EOL land! > On Apr 30, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote: > > Java 7 appears to be EOL starting tomorrow > > https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/java_7.xml > > > > On Apr 29, 2015, at 7:44 AM, David Ave

Re: Wonder 7 and 8

2015-04-30 Thread Ramsey Gurley
Java 7 appears to be EOL starting tomorrow https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/java_7.xml On Apr 29, 2015, at 7:44 AM, David Avendasora wrote: > Hey all > > About a year ago a bunch of work to make Wonder Java 7 compatible. But the > branch is now 86 commits behind the master branch (Wonde

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread Gavin Eadie
OK .. Continuing to appreciate the assistance: Samuel: Are you using the build from Jenkins? --- Yes For what it's worth: org.objectstyle.wolips.componenteditor.sashWeights=1000 Also: Moving to a new workspace isn't a solution --- Still getting errors in the WOD editor (on opening a second WOD p

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread Samuel Pelletier
Strange, Dave merged my pull request that fix this problem few builds ago. Try to remove all the plugin content et reinstall it. When I debugged this problem, I had to do it many times, it seems some parts where not always replaced by a reinstallation. Are you using the build from Jenkins ? htt

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread David Avendasora
The commit that fixed the bug had the following code: if (sashWeights[1] / (float)sashWeights[0] < 0.15) { sashWeights[0] = 85; sashWeights[1] = 15; } So it appears that there are multiple sash weights for the HTMLWodTab and they are percentages and the sum of the two panes shoul

Re: WOLips update site for Eclipse 4.4 (Luna)

2015-04-30 Thread Gavin Eadie
.. sadly, this is only a brief respite. This file (org.objectstyle. wolips.wodclipse.core.prefs) is recreated, with the same contents, and has to be deleted each time before I launch Eclipse. I can live with this if my case is worth exploring for the true cause, or I can start over with a new wor