On Jun 19, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Joe Moreno wrote:
> Where are the configuration setting in Eclipse that determine the
> MacOS[Server]ClassPath.txt settings during an ant build?
That should come from
~/Library/Application Support/WOLips/wolips.properties
I am pretty sure that MacOSServerClassPath
Where are the configuration setting in Eclipse that determine the
MacOS[Server]ClassPath.txt settings during an ant build?
When deployed on OS X Server, my MacOS[Server]ClassPath.txt settings
are not complete and the WOA app throws a
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError.
But, if I manually edit
Eclipse Platform
Version: 3.5.2.R35x_v20100210-0800-9hEiFzmFst-TiEn9hNYgDWg1XN8ulH_JvCNGB
Build id: M20100211-1343
WOLips 3.5.6066
I will check out the warning settings...
thanks,
Ted
--- On Sat, 6/19/10, Mike Schrag wrote:
> From: Mike Schrag
> Subject: Re: inline bindings and valid...
I tend to agree.
I think there's a need to create (semi automatically) some kind of
documentation of a REST API though.
Alex
Le 19 juin 2010 à 14:59, Anjo Krank a écrit :
> Heh. Don't you think it's kinda typical for IBM to take sth that's supposed
> to be a simple replacement of SOAP and t
Orrr change your validation settings and turn off the ones you think are
stupid. The point of the warnings is to tell you when WOLips can't prove that
the binding is correct. In this case, it's a @ operator, which wolips can't
just know because they're registered at runtime. So just go and t
Ignore these stupid warnings. You know better that the binding will work at
runtime or not. Sometimes I get quite weird warnings with Eclipse which
complains for missing WO components but I run the application without any
problem.
Two things you always do.
Avoid using nightly builds and stick
I tried that and it doesn't remove the warning:
Unable to verify operator 'sum.amountOfTime // VALID'
without the // VALID I get a warning:
Unable to verify operator 'sum.amountOfTime'
It is just a warning, I know... but I thought I was doing something wrong
Ted
--- On Sat, 6/19/10, Mik
Heh. Don't you think it's kinda typical for IBM to take sth that's supposed to
be a simple replacement of SOAP and turn it into... SOAP?
Isn't the whole idea of REST *not* to be SOAP-y RPC, but more simple, informal
CRUD?
Cheers, Anjo
Am 18.06.2010 um 19:30 schrieb Ramsey Gurley:
>
> On Jun
Yeah, look like WADL might be the one that will be used the most. I have to
check which JavaScript supports it (Dojo use SMD, that's how I found out that
one).
> I haven't worked with this but came across WADL generated by jersey (REST
> Library for java)
>
> https://wadl.dev.java.net/
>
> Al
> numberformat = "##.##"/>
ms ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobje
Is there a way to mark this line as VALID... with inline bindings... I know I
can push it to the WOD and mark it there, but I thought I would ask..
Ted
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing
11 matches
Mail list logo
