[web2py:26142] Re: What about backward compatibility?

On Jul 10, 11:26 am, mdipierro wrote: > On Jul 10, 9:12 am, Vinicius Assef wrote: > > > What's web2py commitment with backward compatibility? > > We are fully committed to backward compatiliby. We never broke it in 2 > years. We do not accept patches that break it. That is one of the > reason w

[web2py:26150] Re: What about backward compatibility?

On Jul 10, 12:29 pm, mdipierro wrote: > OK. check out web2py.com, the second item after the slides. Nice! And so quick. :-) -- [ ]s Vinicius Assef. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Fra

[web2py:26223] Re: task forces

On Jul 10, 5:49 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote: > Those are bigger, more ambitious projects. > > We could start with something shorter, just to work out the task force > processes Yarko, I agree with you. > How does this sound?   A simpler job to work out the basics of the working > process, f

[web2py:26382] Re: Where to find information?

Thank you, guys. -- Vinicius Assef. On Jul 12, 9:54 pm, mdipierro wrote: > All the web2py API are also described here: > > http://www.web2py.com/examples/default/api > > On Jul 12, 7:08 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote: > > > from the source distribution, look at gluon/html.py - the top has the list

[web2py:26736] Re: The 80/20 rule

On Jul 16, 11:49 pm, mdipierro wrote: > > We can add more and more features to web2py with the effect that: > - web2py grows in complexity to the point that it becomes harder to > maintain > - web2py gets slower I think these 2 are not good choices because a good framework must be fast and simp

[web2py:26770] Re: The 80/20 rule

On Jul 17, 12:32 pm, "Hans Donner" wrote: > i m seeing many posts about the doc needing improvement, and some discusions > about it should be done in the wiki that is not there yet. Which wiki? I could not find a link to it in web2py site. > However, i see little that people offer documentati

[web2py] Re: Foundation CSS Framework

What do you mean with "heavy"? Is it large in KB? On Oct 17, 6:22 pm, pbreit wrote: > Nice new responsive CSS framework but I suspect it's not quite what we are > looking for since it is kind of "heavy".http://foundation.zurb.com/

[web2py] Fwd: How disable date widget?

I found this thread in archives and I have some thoughts about this theme. 1) I need only one date field in just one of my tables to use SQLFORM.widgets.string.widget. All the others, I'd like to use the widget. How can I do this? Anyway, I think that if I set db.my_table.my_date_field.widget = S