[web2py] Procedurally add images?

2012-01-02 Thread vapirix
I know I can step through my database and add url paths to all of my database entries, but is there a way to have web2py process every image as an upload (since it's an upload field), and properly store in the uploads folder for sake of consistency? It would be a lot better than a year from now fig

[web2py] Re: Procedurally add images?

2012-01-02 Thread vapirix
> import glob > for filename in glob.glob('*.png'): >     db.image.insert(file=db.image.file.store(open(filename,'rb'))) > > On Jan 2, 10:55 am, vapirix wrote: > > > > > > > > > I know I can step through my database and add url paths to all of

[web2py] os.path.exists thread safety?

2011-05-26 Thread vapirix
I read in the docs about request.folder and not changing directory with os.path. Since I have literally no idea how and what in python is (and is not) thread safe, is the following thread safe? Do I need to be using os.path.join anywhere in there? if not os.path.exists(images+directory+resource):

[web2py] Authorize.net CIM XML - any experts?

2011-06-03 Thread vapirix
I'm attempting to test out the CIM XML method of working with authorize.net, and I'm not entirely sure how to even display the response I'm getting. I've tried a few tricks I know, but everything is breaking. I know at this point it's gotta' be a simple thing, but my unfamiliarity with python (stil

[web2py] Re: Authorize.net CIM XML - any experts?

2011-06-03 Thread vapirix
I'm using CIM, not AIM, though. On Jun 3, 1:25 pm, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > from gluon.contrib.AuthorizeNet import process > > look into > > gluon/contrib/AuthorizeNet.py > > for examples > > On Jun 3, 12:03 pm, vapirix wrote: > > > > > > >

[web2py] Re: Authorize.net CIM XML - any experts?

2011-06-03 Thread vapirix
Brilliant. :) Thank you, I'm going to give this a shot. On Jun 3, 3:33 pm, howesc wrote: > skip the XML, use SOAP.  that's my solution: > >    profile_id = 42 >    merchantAuthentication={'name':api_login_id, >                         'transactionKey':transaction_key} > >     from pysimplesoap.cl

[web2py] add simple field to registration

2011-08-10 Thread vapirix
I've looked for a good solution to this, and so far it seems the only answer is to roll my own method of registration. I just want to add a single "key" field more or less to user registration, so only people who know the key may register. Is there any simple way to integrate that without implement

[web2py] Re: add simple field to registration

2011-08-11 Thread vapirix
The only problem with that is that then the clients will be able to edit that in their profile. =D It's ok, I'll just roll my own registration page, it's not much work. On Aug 10, 11:06 pm, pbreit wrote: > Might be easiest to display an additional page before the registration page. > > Otherwise

[web2py] Re: add simple field to registration

2011-08-11 Thread vapirix
Sure, but then how can I have them input the key on registration if writable is false? =D On Aug 11, 10:41 am, Marin Pranjic wrote: > They will not if you set writable = false. > > Marin > > On 11 Aug 2011 17:16, "vapirix" wrote: > > The only problem with that i

[web2py] Re: add simple field to registration

2011-08-11 Thread vapirix
Brilliant. This is why I check these boards. =D Thank you, Marin. On Aug 11, 10:51 am, Marin Pranjic wrote: > Make it True on registration form, and false in login form. > > If reguest.args(0) == 'register': db.auth_user.xyz.writable = true > else: ...= false > > On

[web2py] proper usage of exclusive_domain = True ?

2011-08-16 Thread vapirix
So I'm attempting to set up the usage scenario of: domain1.com -> load app 1 domain2.com -> load app 2 etc. etc. I need domain1 to NOT have access to app 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. That all works using the router's "domain" settings. Obviously you run into the problem of: domain1.com loads app1, but domai

[web2py] Re: proper usage of exclusive_domain = True ?

2011-08-17 Thread vapirix
OR can maybe somebody point me in a different direction to achieve the same thing without a hilariously complicated config process that I won't want to do every time? =) On Aug 16, 5:07 pm, vapirix wrote: > So I'm attempting to set up the usage scenario of: > > domain

[web2py] Re: proper usage of exclusive_domain = True ?

2011-08-17 Thread vapirix
in. I'll look at it when I get home later. > > On Aug 17, 2011, at 12:57 PM, vapirix wrote: > > > > > > > > > OR can maybe somebody point me in a different direction to achieve the > > same thing without a hilariously complicated config process that I >

[web2py] Re: proper usage of exclusive_domain = True ?

2011-08-18 Thread vapirix
tunately I'm using wsgi, and I have no idea how I would go about setting up your separate application directory idea. If anybody DOES know, I'm all ears. =) On Aug 17, 10:46 pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote: > On Aug 17, 2011, at 4:29 PM, vapirix wrote: > > > That would be truly ex