Re: [web2py] routes on GAE

2011-03-09 Thread howesc
+1 for app.example.yaml if it weren't for source control i would have been SOL a crap-ton of times. :)

Re: [web2py] routes on GAE

2011-03-08 Thread Jonathan Lundell
On Mar 8, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Richard Baron Penman wrote: > yes also worked for me. > > People will need to change the application name, so should this be included > in app.yaml but commented out? I think that app.yaml needs to become app.example.yaml (along the lines of routes.example.py and log

Re: [web2py] routes on GAE

2011-03-08 Thread Richard Baron Penman
yes also worked for me. People will need to change the application name, so should this be included in app.yaml but commented out? On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote: > On Mar 8, 2011, at 6:36 PM, Plumo wrote: > > thanks John, that makes sense. > > I tested it on the stock

Re: [web2py] routes on GAE

2011-03-08 Thread Jonathan Lundell
On Mar 8, 2011, at 6:36 PM, Plumo wrote: > thanks John, that makes sense. I tested it on the stock welcome app, and it seems to work fine. I'll send Massimo a patch for the example app.yaml, since this is a fairly common requirement.

Re: [web2py] routes on GAE

2011-03-08 Thread Plumo
thanks John, that makes sense.

Re: [web2py] routes on GAE

2011-03-08 Thread Jonathan Lundell
On Mar 7, 2011, at 11:33 PM, Plumo wrote: > I have the following listing in routes: > ('/robots.txt', '/cms/static/robots.txt') > > This lets me access /robots.txt on my local computer, but returns "invalid > request" when I upload this to GAE. Are there meant to be any differences > when using