Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-10-31 Thread Marcelo Huerta
El jueves, 18 de agosto de 2016, 16:44:05 (UTC-3), Massimo Di Pierro escribió: > > It is possible. web3py is code name for experimental stuff. Mostly new > form/grid logic that will be backported to web2py. > > I read somewhere that you are thinking of ditching SQLFORM (and, I assume, the derive

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-09-07 Thread Paolo Valleri
Current master branch passes almost all unittests on python 3.5. If anyone is interested in helping with the final steps, a checklist is here https://github.com/web2py/web2py/issues/1353#issue-159010482 On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 5:43:55 AM UTC+2, jjs0sbw wrote: > > I agree that a better te

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-09-05 Thread joseph simpson
I agree that a better test environment is necessary... In the next few months I will be starting a project with web2py --- or whatever -- A standard test approach and environment will be the first item to be addressed.. What are the basic requirements for a test environment What needs to be

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-09-05 Thread António Ramos
There it goes again another endless round of names Why the hell do we need "py" in the name ? Is that really necessary? why? I think if we forget "py" we may find a lot of nice names and forget a lot of bad ones. For example: Call it Massimo or Pierro... Its what it is in the end right? And yes,

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-09-05 Thread Pbop
I recommend AbilityPy. People want a framework with rich abilities. The Py gives a nod that this is a python framework (with abilities). Ability preceding Py ensures the framework is at the top of any list of frameworks given the alpha sort of A+B for AbilityPy. The domain is also available la

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-09-02 Thread Joe Barnhart
I say pick a new, random name that says nothing about "web" or "python". In Marketing, they like to pick names with no pre-defined meaning and then "define" it to mean what they want. Just choose a name that is easy to pronounce for non-English speakers and has a short, catchy sound. Google i

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-08-18 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
It is possible. web3py is code name for experimental stuff. Mostly new form/grid logic that will be backported to web2py. On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 19:09:43 UTC-5, Jason Solack wrote: > > I saw a post on the developer forum that the newer version of web2py was > mostly Python 3 compatible...

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-08-17 Thread Jason Solack
I saw a post on the developer forum that the newer version of web2py was mostly Python 3 compatible... Is it possible that there won't be a need for web3py? -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.g

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-08-16 Thread fabio . filhossi
Neither do I. I really like this name !! So, Massimo, has this project been developing yet? On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 9:45:34 PM UTC-2, JorgeH wrote: > > I don't have any problem with the name whatsoever. I like it. > > On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:54:58 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wro

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-19 Thread JorgeH
I don't have any problem with the name whatsoever. I like it. On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:54:58 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > I never liked the name either. The original name was Gluon but somebody > threatened to sue me for trademark infringement (which was not the case) > and I

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-19 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
I never liked the name either. The original name was Gluon but somebody threatened to sue me for trademark infringement (which was not the case) and I had to change it in a hurry. Not a joke. Massimo On Monday, 19 January 2015 12:17:44 UTC-6, Ramos wrote: > > i personally hate the name. In cont

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-19 Thread António Ramos
i personally hate the name. In contrast with how much i like the framework. Its a phrase compacted in a single word. People are confusing its name with python versions. Now for a one million dollar question: what does it mean: Web2py3 ? web3py2 ? Regards António 2015-01-19 17:05 GMT+

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-19 Thread Tito Garrido
I wouldn't change the name at all... Because it is not related to python version lets just stay with web2py :) On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Massimo Di Pierro < massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote: > py4web? > > > On Sunday, 18 January 2015 15:22:10 UTC-6, Michele Comitini wrote: >> >> the 3 in

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-18 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
py4web? On Sunday, 18 January 2015 15:22:10 UTC-6, Michele Comitini wrote: > > the 3 in web3py is not related to python3, just as the 2 was not related > to python2. > > We could skip the 3 and use 4 which is much more meaningful :-) > > look: > web 2(to) py > web 4(for) py > > and compare: > web

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-18 Thread Michele Comitini
the 3 in web3py is not related to python3, just as the 2 was not related to python2. We could skip the 3 and use 4 which is much more meaningful :-) look: web 2(to) py web 4(for) py and compare: web 3(???) py?? 2015-01-17 7:22 GMT+01:00 Massimo Di Pierro : > Nothing anytime soon. Stick with