El jueves, 18 de agosto de 2016, 16:44:05 (UTC-3), Massimo Di Pierro
escribió:
>
> It is possible. web3py is code name for experimental stuff. Mostly new
> form/grid logic that will be backported to web2py.
>
>
I read somewhere that you are thinking of ditching SQLFORM (and, I assume,
the derive
Current master branch passes almost all unittests on python 3.5.
If anyone is interested in helping with the final steps, a checklist is
here https://github.com/web2py/web2py/issues/1353#issue-159010482
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 5:43:55 AM UTC+2, jjs0sbw wrote:
>
> I agree that a better te
I agree that a better test environment is necessary...
In the next few months I will be starting a project with web2py --- or
whatever --
A standard test approach and environment will be the first item to be
addressed..
What are the basic requirements for a test environment
What needs to be
I think the name is the least of our problems. We should debate about what
is missing to achieve this "web3py", how many people its demands to
accomplish this new framework, main features, such as test environment
(!!!), server side rendering or not, etc.
On Friday, October 25, 2013 at 11:26:3
There it goes again another endless round of names
Why the hell do we need "py" in the name ? Is that really necessary? why?
I think if we forget "py" we may find a lot of nice names and forget a lot
of bad ones.
For example:
Call it Massimo or Pierro... Its what it is in the end right?
And yes,
I recommend AbilityPy. People want a framework with rich abilities. The Py
gives a nod that this is a python framework (with abilities). Ability
preceding Py ensures the framework is at the top of any list of frameworks
given the alpha sort of A+B for AbilityPy. The domain is also available
la
I say pick a new, random name that says nothing about "web" or "python".
In Marketing, they like to pick names with no pre-defined meaning and then
"define" it to mean what they want.
Just choose a name that is easy to pronounce for non-English speakers and
has a short, catchy sound. Google i
It is possible. web3py is code name for experimental stuff. Mostly new
form/grid logic that will be backported to web2py.
On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 19:09:43 UTC-5, Jason Solack wrote:
>
> I saw a post on the developer forum that the newer version of web2py was
> mostly Python 3 compatible...
I saw a post on the developer forum that the newer version of web2py was mostly
Python 3 compatible... Is it possible that there won't be a need for web3py?
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.g
Neither do I. I really like this name !!
So, Massimo, has this project been developing yet?
On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 9:45:34 PM UTC-2, JorgeH wrote:
>
> I don't have any problem with the name whatsoever. I like it.
>
> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:54:58 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wro
I don't have any problem with the name whatsoever. I like it.
On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:54:58 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> I never liked the name either. The original name was Gluon but somebody
> threatened to sue me for trademark infringement (which was not the case)
> and I
I never liked the name either. The original name was Gluon but somebody
threatened to sue me for trademark infringement (which was not the case)
and I had to change it in a hurry. Not a joke.
Massimo
On Monday, 19 January 2015 12:17:44 UTC-6, Ramos wrote:
>
> i personally hate the name. In cont
i personally hate the name. In contrast with how much i like the framework.
Its a phrase compacted in a single word.
People are confusing its name with python versions.
Now for a one million dollar question:
what does it mean:
Web2py3 ?
web3py2 ?
Regards
António
2015-01-19 17:05 GMT+
I wouldn't change the name at all... Because it is not related to python
version lets just stay with web2py :)
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Massimo Di Pierro <
massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> py4web?
>
>
> On Sunday, 18 January 2015 15:22:10 UTC-6, Michele Comitini wrote:
>>
>> the 3 in
py4web?
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 15:22:10 UTC-6, Michele Comitini wrote:
>
> the 3 in web3py is not related to python3, just as the 2 was not related
> to python2.
>
> We could skip the 3 and use 4 which is much more meaningful :-)
>
> look:
> web 2(to) py
> web 4(for) py
>
> and compare:
> web
the 3 in web3py is not related to python3, just as the 2 was not related to
python2.
We could skip the 3 and use 4 which is much more meaningful :-)
look:
web 2(to) py
web 4(for) py
and compare:
web 3(???) py??
2015-01-17 7:22 GMT+01:00 Massimo Di Pierro :
> Nothing anytime soon. Stick with
Nothing anytime soon. Stick with web2py if it works for you. It works for
us. ;-)
On Friday, 16 January 2015 09:56:32 UTC-6, Manny Felicio wrote:
>
> Hi Massimo,
>
> How are you?
>
> I will be starting a new project, so far I think for may reasons, I want
> to use Python and I like the style of
Hi Massimo,
How are you?
I will be starting a new project, so far I think for may reasons, I want to
use Python and I like the style of your Web2py. Since, Web3py is already
on the air for Python 3 support, Do you think it will be seamless, if let's
say, I will use web2py now then when web3py
I would not say it is the main "problem". It should be easy to do. It was
done once already my Mariano for an earlier version.
It is just that nobody has shown must interest in helping do it. We already
use a a python 3 compatible syntax.
After this is converted it needs testing and I am not sure
ok. does the dal make large scale use of some particular py2 idioms?
is it a strings (unicode in py3) vs bytes problem?
is there a work in progress of this or anything else in web3py anywhere?
seems like it will be unlikely to eventuate or progress if there is no work
relating to this in any
the main problem is porting dal.py to python 3.x
El viernes, 25 de octubre de 2013 21:26:36 UTC-5, elguavas escribió:
>
> hi there,
>
> i've seen peppered throughout this list references to "web3py". i seems
> like it's mostly the unofficial name of of a concept at this stage, but i
> also see
I am sorry to day not much has happened. :-(
On Friday, 25 October 2013 21:26:36 UTC-5, elguavas wrote:
>
> hi there,
>
> i've seen peppered throughout this list references to "web3py". i seems
> like it's mostly the unofficial name of of a concept at this stage, but i
> also see references to w
22 matches
Mail list logo
