Oh, OK. Will do. Thank you.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
>
> > In my case, the rss is pretty OK (a 4 GB machine, 12 workers). But
> address
> > space is high -
> > {address space usage: 284536832 bytes/271MB} {rss usage: 22073344
> > bytes/21MB}
>
> And why you are
> In my case, the rss is pretty OK (a 4 GB machine, 12 workers). But address
> space is high -
> {address space usage: 284536832 bytes/271MB} {rss usage: 22073344
> bytes/21MB}
And why you are worried ? It is virtual memory, i could allocate 2GB of
address space without wasting more than few k of
In my case, the rss is pretty OK (a 4 GB machine, 12 workers). But address
space is high -
{address space usage: 284536832 bytes/271MB} {rss usage: 22073344
bytes/21MB}
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
>
> > OK. My real doubt is more about how uwsgi works. It scanned th
> OK. My real doubt is more about how uwsgi works. It scanned through many
> files and probably loaded quite a bit of those in memory. When a new
> process is spawned, will this (buffer) be passed to that? If so, it is
> better to increase the limit. On the other than hand, if it is some
> bootstr
OK. My real doubt is more about how uwsgi works. It scanned through many
files and probably loaded quite a bit of those in memory. When a new
process is spawned, will this (buffer) be passed to that? If so, it is
better to increase the limit. On the other than hand, if it is some
bootstrap process
as long as you indeed want to relaunch any process going upper that limit
(that, as every other "template" is a rule of thumb) yes. Alter it if you
feel that your app needs more memory
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:04:23 PM UTC+1, Jayadevan M wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I used
>
> https://github.com/we
6 matches
Mail list logo
